AWAY vs. FDIS
AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) and FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index while FDIS tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AWAY returned -5.64%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for FDIS. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AWAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FDIS.
Performance
AWAY vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWAY achieves a -3.03% return, which is significantly lower than FDIS's 2.35% return.
AWAY
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- -6.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.29%
FDIS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 11.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $667.86K | $330.70K | $217.64K | |
| $9.87M | $7.75M | $9.31M |
AWAY vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | -3.03% | -3.36% | 10.44% | 17.94% | -32.25% | -5.91% | 3.47% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 2.35% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 39.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWAY and FDIS is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between AWAY and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
AWAY vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AWAY
FDIS
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AWAY
FDIS
Technology
AWAY
FDIS
Communication Services
AWAY
FDIS
Industrials
AWAY
FDIS
Financial Services
AWAY
FDIS
Basic Materials
AWAY
-
FDIS
-
Consumer Defensive
AWAY
-
FDIS
Energy
AWAY
-
FDIS
-
Healthcare
AWAY
-
FDIS
Real Estate
AWAY
-
FDIS
Utilities
AWAY
-
FDIS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWAY vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank
AWAY
FDIS
AWAY vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWAY | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.11 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.71 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 2.06 | -2.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWAY vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWAY drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAY and FDIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWAY | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -39.16% | -17.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.83% | -15.50% | -17.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.83% | -27.43% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.10% | -39.16% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.50% | -2.36% | -39.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.50% | -7.46% | -29.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.45% | 5.36% | +13.09% |
Volatility
AWAY vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) at 6.90%. This indicates that AWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWAY | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 6.90% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.01% | 14.79% | +4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.17% | 19.32% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 24.11% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 22.40% | +9.24% |
AWAY vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWAY vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.72% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWAY and FDIS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AWAY has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to FDIS (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAY dropped -56.57% vs FDIS's -39.16%.
On 5-year performance, FDIS leads with 5.81% vs -5.64% for AWAY. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 5.81% return vs -5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.
FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.
AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AWAY and 0.08% for FDIS.
FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWAY and FDIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer