PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVXC vs. FFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AVXC vs. FFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AVXC vs. FFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
6.08%31.45%-2.53%
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
0.24%27.85%-2.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVXC achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly higher than FFGX's 0.24% return.


AVXC

1D
3.79%
1M
-10.21%
YTD
6.08%
6M
14.48%
1Y
42.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFGX

1D
3.99%
1M
-8.67%
YTD
0.24%
6M
2.81%
1Y
20.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AVXC vs. FFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AVXC vs. FFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGX
FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVXC vs. FFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVXCFFGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

1.06

+1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

1.56

+1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.23

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.52

+1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.26

5.95

+6.31

AVXC vs. FFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the FFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVXC and FFGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVXCFFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

1.06

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.97

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between AVXC and FFGX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AVXC vs. FFGX - Dividend Comparison

AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than FFGX's 1.60% yield.


Drawdowns

AVXC vs. FFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than FFGX's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and FFGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AVXCFFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-14.79%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-12.86%

-1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.78%

-9.38%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-2.09%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.28%

+0.08%

Volatility

AVXC vs. FFGX - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) at 9.96%. This indicates that AVXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AVXCFFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.67%

9.96%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

13.35%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.40%

19.30%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

18.32%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

18.32%

-1.05%