AVUQ vs. PBUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVUQ (Avantis U.S. Quality ETF) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. AVUQ is actively managed, while PBUS is passively managed. Over the past year, AVUQ returned 30.44% vs 27.65% for PBUS. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVUQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.

Performance

AVUQ vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AVUQ having a 11.23% return and PBUS slightly lower at 10.82%.

AVUQ

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 6M: 11.01%
• 1Y: 30.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBUS

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 5.14%
• YTD: 10.82%
• 6M: 10.68%
• 1Y: 27.65%
• 3Y*: 22.61%
• 5Y*: 13.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUQ vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF	11.23%	22.52%
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF	10.82%	21.45%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUQ and PBUS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.96

The correlation between AVUQ and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVUQ vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVUQ	PBUS
Technology	46.3%	35.4%
Consumer Cyclical	15.1%	10.1%
Communication Services	12.2%	11.3%
Industrials	7.7%	8.6%
Financial Services	5.8%	11.6%
Healthcare	5.3%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	4.8%
Energy	2.5%	3.6%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.8%
Utilities	0.8%	2.3%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.9%

Return for Risk

AVUQ vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUQ

AVUQ Risk / Return Rank: 56
AVUQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
AVUQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
AVUQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
AVUQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
AVUQ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

PBUS

PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 68
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUQ vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVUQ	PBUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.30	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.15	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.41	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	3.08	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	13.93	-3.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVUQ vs. PBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the PBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUQ and PBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVUQ	PBUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	2.30	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	0.80	+0.75

Drawdowns

AVUQ vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUQ drawdown since its inception was -11.86%, smaller than the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUQ and PBUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVUQ	PBUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.86%	-33.15%	+21.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.61%	-9.02%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-0.64%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.08%	-5.13%	+3.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	1.99%	+0.93%

Volatility

AVUQ vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.94%. This indicates that AVUQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVUQ	PBUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	2.94%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	9.13%	+2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	12.06%	+3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.42%	17.05%	+2.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.42%	19.33%	+0.09%

AVUQ vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVUQ vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison

AVUQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than PBUS's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF	0.35%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF	0.98%	1.05%	1.20%	1.36%	1.71%	0.98%	1.35%	1.53%	2.33%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVUQ and PBUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, AVUQ and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVUQ or PBUS?

AVUQ has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUQ dropped -11.86% vs PBUS's -33.15%.

Which ETF is better, AVUQ or PBUS?

On 1-year performance, AVUQ leads with 30.44% vs 27.65% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVUQ or PBUS?

Over the 1-year period, AVUQ has performed better with a 30.44% return vs 27.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVUQ or PBUS?

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVUQ or PBUS?

PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.35% for AVUQ.

What is the main difference between AVUQ and PBUS?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis Investors and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUQ and 0.04% for PBUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.