AVUQ vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AVUQ (Avantis U.S. Quality ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. AVUQ is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past year, AVUQ returned 24.50% vs 17.91% for SCHG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVUQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

AVUQ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUQ achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return.

AVUQ

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: -2.27%
• YTD: 7.35%
• 6M: 6.08%
• 1Y: 24.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUQ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF	7.35%	21.84%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.35%	26.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUQ and SCHG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	0.97

The correlation between AVUQ and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVUQ vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVUQ	SCHG
Technology	48.7%	46.7%
Consumer Cyclical	14.2%	12.4%
Communication Services	11.8%	15.3%
Industrials	7.6%	6.0%
Financial Services	5.4%	6.6%
Healthcare	5.4%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	1.6%
Energy	2.2%	0.7%
Basic Materials	1.2%	1.3%
Utilities	0.7%	0.4%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.5%

Return for Risk

AVUQ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUQ

AVUQ Risk / Return Rank: 45
AVUQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AVUQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
AVUQ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
AVUQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
AVUQ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUQ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVUQ	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.11	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	1.56	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.20	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	1.10	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.13	3.58	+4.55

AVUQ vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUQ and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVUQ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUQ drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUQ and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVUQ	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.35%	-34.59%	+22.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.61%	-16.41%	+4.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.42%	-6.46%	+2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-5.20%	+3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	5.02%	-2.00%

Volatility

AVUQ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 5.97% and 5.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVUQ	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	5.91%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	12.52%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.14%	16.24%	-0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.67%	22.38%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.67%	21.58%	-1.91%

AVUQ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVUQ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

AVUQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF	0.46%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVUQ and SCHG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, AVUQ and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVUQ or SCHG?

AVUQ has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUQ dropped -12.35% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, AVUQ or SCHG?

On 1-year performance, AVUQ leads with 24.50% vs 17.91% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVUQ or SCHG?

Over the 1-year period, AVUQ has performed better with a 24.50% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVUQ or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVUQ or SCHG?

AVUQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between AVUQ and SCHG?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUQ and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVUQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.