PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVS vs. TMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVS vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVS achieves a -22.61% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -5.59% return.


AVS

1D
12.36%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-22.61%
6M
-16.23%
1Y
-46.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMF

1D
0.57%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-5.59%
6M
-9.73%
1Y
-3.14%
3Y*
-20.49%
5Y*
-30.44%
10Y*
-16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVS vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVS
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares
-22.61%-45.96%-27.15%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
-5.59%-2.94%-20.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AVS and TMF is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVS vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVS
AVS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
AVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVS vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVSTMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.00

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.12

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

-0.27

-1.14

AVS vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVS Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVS and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVSTMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.03

-0.11

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.96

-0.13

-0.83

Drawdowns

AVS vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVS drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVS and TMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVSTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.77%

-92.89%

+16.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.22%

-26.51%

-28.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.73%

-92.18%

+18.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.93%

-43.64%

-5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.58%

11.55%

+21.03%

Volatility

AVS vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) has a higher volatility of 17.18% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.99%. This indicates that AVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVSTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.18%

7.99%

+9.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.88%

19.02%

+13.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.81%

28.76%

+16.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.72%

46.72%

+7.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.72%

43.91%

+9.81%

AVS vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVS has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVS vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

AVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than TMF's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVS
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares
3.94%4.22%1.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
4.13%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVS and TMF have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVS has higher volatility (17.18%) compared to TMF (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVS dropped -76.77% vs TMF's -92.89%.

On 1-year performance, TMF leads with -3.14% vs -46.04% for AVS. On fees, AVS is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TMF has performed better with a -3.14% return vs -46.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVS is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 3.94% for AVS.

AVS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for AVS and 1.01% for TMF.

TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVS and TMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer