AVS vs. TMF
AVS (Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). AVS is actively managed, while TMF is passively managed. Over the past year, AVS returned -46.04% vs -3.14% for TMF. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. AVS charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
AVS vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVS achieves a -22.61% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -5.59% return.
AVS
- 1D
- 12.36%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -22.61%
- 6M
- -16.23%
- 1Y
- -46.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMF
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -5.59%
- 6M
- -9.73%
- 1Y
- -3.14%
- 3Y*
- -20.49%
- 5Y*
- -30.44%
- 10Y*
- -16.34%
AVS vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AVS Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares | -22.61% | -45.96% | -27.15% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -5.59% | -2.94% | -20.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVS and TMF is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVS vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
AVS
TMF
AVS vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.00 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | -0.12 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | -0.27 | -1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.03 | -0.11 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.96 | -0.13 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
AVS vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVS drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVS and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.77% | -92.89% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.22% | -26.51% | -28.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.73% | -92.18% | +18.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.93% | -43.64% | -5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.58% | 11.55% | +21.03% |
Volatility
AVS vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) has a higher volatility of 17.18% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.99%. This indicates that AVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.18% | 7.99% | +9.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.88% | 19.02% | +13.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.81% | 28.76% | +16.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.72% | 46.72% | +7.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.72% | 43.91% | +9.81% |
AVS vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVS has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVS vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
AVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than TMF's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVS Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares | 3.94% | 4.22% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.13% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVS and TMF have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVS has higher volatility (17.18%) compared to TMF (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVS dropped -76.77% vs TMF's -92.89%.
On 1-year performance, TMF leads with -3.14% vs -46.04% for AVS. On fees, AVS is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TMF has performed better with a -3.14% return vs -46.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVS is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 3.94% for AVS.
AVS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for AVS and 1.01% for TMF.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVS and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer