PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVS vs. AVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVS vs. AVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) and Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVS achieves a -22.61% return, which is significantly lower than AVL's 28.44% return.


AVS

1D
12.36%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-22.61%
6M
-16.23%
1Y
-46.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVL

1D
-25.37%
1M
-8.09%
YTD
28.44%
6M
3.49%
1Y
93.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVS vs. AVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVS
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares
-22.61%-45.96%-27.15%
AVL
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
28.44%54.38%39.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AVS and AVL is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

-1.00

The correlation between AVS and AVL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVS vs. AVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVS
AVS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
AVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

AVL
AVL Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVS vs. AVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) and Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVSAVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.24

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

1.75

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

3.89

-5.31

AVS vs. AVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVS Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the AVL Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVS and AVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVSAVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.03

1.05

-2.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.96

0.81

-1.77

Drawdowns

AVS vs. AVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVS drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, which is greater than AVL's maximum drawdown of -70.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVS and AVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVSAVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.77%

-70.63%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.22%

-53.69%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.73%

-26.09%

-47.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.93%

-23.38%

-25.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.58%

24.05%

+8.53%

Volatility

AVS vs. AVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) is 17.18%, while Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) has a volatility of 38.09%. This indicates that AVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVSAVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.18%

38.09%

-20.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.88%

68.34%

-35.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.81%

89.40%

-44.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.72%

107.05%

-53.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.72%

107.05%

-53.33%

AVS vs. AVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVS has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than AVL's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVS vs. AVL - Dividend Comparison

AVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than AVL's 22.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AVL
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
22.99%29.04%0.22%
AVS
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares
3.94%4.22%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVS and AVL have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVL has higher volatility (38.09%) compared to AVS (17.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVS dropped -76.77% vs AVL's -70.63%.

On 1-year performance, AVL leads with 93.28% vs -46.04% for AVS. On fees, AVS is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, AVS has been the lower-risk option at 17.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVL has performed better with a 93.28% return vs -46.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVS is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for AVL.

AVL has the higher dividend yield at 22.99%, compared with 3.94% for AVS.

AVS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AVL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for AVS and 1.04% for AVL.

AVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVS and AVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer