AVNV vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AVNV (Avantis All International Markets Value ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. AVNV is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Over the past year, AVNV returned 36.33% vs 28.75% for EFAS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVNV charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

AVNV vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVNV achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 13.06% return.

AVNV

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 14.54%
• 6M: 17.59%
• 1Y: 36.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.69%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 17.18%
• 1Y: 28.75%
• 3Y*: 24.51%
• 5Y*: 12.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNV vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVNV Avantis All International Markets Value ETF	14.54%	39.93%	5.43%	9.62%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	13.06%	46.83%	3.07%	12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AVNV and EFAS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.74

The correlation between AVNV and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNV vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVNV	EFAS
Financial Services	24.2%	30.1%
Industrials	17.5%	9.9%
Basic Materials	14.2%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	1.9%
Energy	10.4%	13.7%
Technology	8.6%	0.1%
Communication Services	4.3%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	8.1%
Healthcare	3.3%	0.1%
Real Estate	1.6%	11.3%
Utilities	1.5%	14.4%

Return for Risk

AVNV vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNV

AVNV Risk / Return Rank: 73
AVNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
AVNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AVNV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AVNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
AVNV Martin Ratio Rank: 67

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 83
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNV vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVNV	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.73	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	3.84	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.47	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	5.45	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.12	14.46	-2.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVNV vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNV Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNV and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVNV	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	2.73	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	0.56	+1.03

Drawdowns

AVNV vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNV drawdown since its inception was -13.89%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNV and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVNV	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.89%	-44.38%	+30.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-5.30%	-6.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-2.92%	+2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-7.07%	+4.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	1.99%	+1.01%

Volatility

AVNV vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.76%. This indicates that AVNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVNV	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	2.76%	+1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.30%	8.19%	+4.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.52%	10.57%	+3.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	15.59%	-0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.77%	18.33%	-3.56%

AVNV vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNV has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVNV vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

AVNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than EFAS's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AVNV Avantis All International Markets Value ETF	2.85%	3.14%	3.51%	1.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.72%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVNV and EFAS in my portfolio?

AVNV and EFAS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVNV or EFAS?

AVNV has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to EFAS (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNV dropped -13.89% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, AVNV or EFAS?

On 1-year performance, AVNV leads with 36.33% vs 28.75% for EFAS. On fees, AVNV is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVNV or EFAS?

Over the 1-year period, AVNV has performed better with a 36.33% return vs 28.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVNV or EFAS?

AVNV is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVNV or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 2.85% for AVNV.

What is the main difference between AVNV and EFAS?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for AVNV and 0.56% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.