AVNS vs. KMB
AVNS (Avanos Medical, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. AVNS operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, AVNS returned -2.53%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for KMB. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AVNS vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVNS achieves a 122.44% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's -4.92% return. Over the past 10 years, AVNS has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of -2.53%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 0.29% annualized return.
AVNS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 122.44%
- 6M
- 120.87%
- 1Y
- 100.64%
- 3Y*
- 0.20%
- 5Y*
- -8.59%
- 10Y*
- -2.53%
KMB
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- -4.92%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- -29.05%
- 3Y*
- -7.87%
- 5Y*
- -2.82%
- 10Y*
- 0.29%
AVNS vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVNS Avanos Medical, Inc. | 122.44% | -29.46% | -29.02% | -17.11% | -21.95% | -24.43% | 36.14% | -24.76% | -3.01% | 24.88% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -4.92% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVNS and KMB is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2014 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
AVNS:
-$1.99
KMB:
$5.93
AVNS:
1.22
KMB:
1.91
AVNS:
$715.90M
KMB:
$16.54B
AVNS:
$353.40M
KMB:
$5.93B
AVNS:
-$29.60M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVNS vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
AVNS
KMB
AVNS vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avanos Medical, Inc. (AVNS) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVNS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 0.78 | +0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | -0.98 | +5.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.06 | -1.51 | +12.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVNS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | -1.17 | +2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | -0.14 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.01 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.46 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
AVNS vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVNS drawdown since its inception was -86.39%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNS and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVNS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.39% | -36.97% | -49.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.39% | -29.79% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.41% | -34.06% | -28.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.55% | -34.06% | -41.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.39% | -34.06% | -52.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.62% | -32.85% | -32.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.04% | -8.84% | -38.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.13% | 19.81% | -10.68% |
Volatility
AVNS vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avanos Medical, Inc. (AVNS) is 1.36%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that AVNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVNS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 6.43% | -5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.06% | 15.33% | +41.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.95% | 24.88% | +53.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.00% | 19.95% | +28.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.65% | 20.96% | +23.69% |
Dividends
AVNS vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
AVNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVNS Avanos Medical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.34% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
AVNS vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Avanos Medical, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AVNS vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
AVNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avanos Medical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 94.20M and revenue of 182.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
AVNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avanos Medical, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.90M and revenue of 182.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
AVNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avanos Medical, Inc. reported a net income of 5.10M and revenue of 182.20M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVNS and KMB have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to AVNS (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNS dropped -86.39% vs KMB's -36.97%.
AVNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVNS and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer