AVNS vs. CGXU
AVNS (Avanos Medical, Inc.) is a stock, while CGXU (Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 3 years, AVNS returned 0.20%/yr vs 18.00%/yr for CGXU. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AVNS vs. CGXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVNS achieves a 122.44% return, which is significantly higher than CGXU's 19.90% return.
AVNS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 122.44%
- 6M
- 120.87%
- 1Y
- 100.64%
- 3Y*
- 0.20%
- 5Y*
- -8.59%
- 10Y*
- -2.53%
CGXU
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 19.90%
- 6M
- 22.54%
- 1Y
- 41.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVNS vs. CGXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVNS Avanos Medical, Inc. | 122.44% | -29.46% | -29.02% | -17.11% | -20.32% |
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF | 19.90% | 26.31% | 4.36% | 15.75% | -14.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVNS and CGXU is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.41 |
The correlation between AVNS and CGXU shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVNS vs. CGXU — Risk / Return Rank
AVNS
CGXU
AVNS vs. CGXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avanos Medical, Inc. (AVNS) and Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVNS | CGXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 2.09 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.62 | 2.85 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 3.14 | +1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.06 | 11.72 | -0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVNS | CGXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 2.09 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.56 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
AVNS vs. CGXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVNS drawdown since its inception was -86.39%, which is greater than CGXU's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNS and CGXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVNS | CGXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.39% | -25.64% | -60.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.39% | -13.14% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.41% | -21.63% | -40.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.62% | -1.14% | -64.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.04% | -6.66% | -40.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.13% | 3.52% | +5.61% |
Volatility
AVNS vs. CGXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avanos Medical, Inc. (AVNS) is 1.36%, while Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that AVNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVNS | CGXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 7.31% | -5.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.06% | 17.05% | +40.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.95% | 19.83% | +58.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.00% | 19.93% | +28.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.65% | 19.93% | +24.72% |
Dividends
AVNS vs. CGXU - Dividend Comparison
AVNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVNS Avanos Medical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF | 4.43% | 5.31% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVNS and CGXU have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGXU has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to AVNS (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNS dropped -86.39% vs CGXU's -25.64%.
CGXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVNS and CGXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer