AVNM vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVNM (Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. AVNM is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Over the past year, AVNM returned 35.92% vs 28.68% for EFAS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVNM charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

AVNM vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVNM achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 12.96% return.

AVNM

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 6M: 17.96%
• 1Y: 35.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAS

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 6M: 17.29%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 24.47%
• 5Y*: 12.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNM vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	14.81%	38.30%	5.52%	8.60%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	12.96%	46.83%	3.07%	12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AVNM and EFAS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.73

The correlation between AVNM and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNM vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVNM	EFAS
Financial Services	23.2%	30.1%
Industrials	17.1%	9.9%
Technology	12.5%	0.1%
Basic Materials	11.7%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	1.9%
Energy	8.3%	13.7%
Healthcare	4.4%	0.1%
Communication Services	4.3%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	8.1%
Utilities	2.9%	14.4%
Real Estate	1.7%	11.3%

Return for Risk

AVNM vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNM

AVNM Risk / Return Rank: 69
AVNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AVNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AVNM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
AVNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AVNM Martin Ratio Rank: 65

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 81
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNM vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVNM	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.73	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.83	-0.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.47	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	5.44	-2.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.16	14.48	-2.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVNM vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNM Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNM and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVNM	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.73	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.56	+0.98

Drawdowns

AVNM vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNM drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNM and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVNM	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.03%	-44.38%	+30.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.59%	-5.30%	-6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-3.01%	+1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.55%	-7.08%	+4.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	1.99%	+0.97%

Volatility

AVNM vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.96%. This indicates that AVNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVNM	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	2.96%	+2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	8.20%	+4.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	10.60%	+4.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.86%	15.59%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	18.33%	-3.47%

AVNM vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNM has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVNM vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

AVNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than EFAS's 5.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	2.51%	2.76%	3.51%	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	5.05%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVNM and EFAS in my portfolio?

AVNM and EFAS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVNM or EFAS?

AVNM has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to EFAS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNM dropped -14.03% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, AVNM or EFAS?

On 1-year performance, AVNM leads with 35.92% vs 28.68% for EFAS. On fees, AVNM is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVNM or EFAS?

Over the 1-year period, AVNM has performed better with a 35.92% return vs 28.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVNM or EFAS?

AVNM is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVNM or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 2.51% for AVNM.

What is the main difference between AVNM and EFAS?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for AVNM and 0.56% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.