AVGU vs. PLTM
AVGU (GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - AVGU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). AVGU is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVGU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.
Performance
AVGU vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGU achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly higher than PLTM's -19.61% return.
AVGU
- 1D
- -6.67%
- 1M
- -20.58%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTM
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- -19.61%
- 6M
- -27.97%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
AVGU vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGU GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF | 3.14% | 33.87% |
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust | -19.61% | 50.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGU and PLTM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGU vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank
AVGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTM
AVGU vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVGU | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVGU vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGU drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGU and PLTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGU | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.30% | -42.32% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -40.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.82% | -40.62% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.72% | -18.66% | -2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.37% | — |
Volatility
AVGU vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGU | PLTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.75% | 51.35% | +43.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.75% | 32.99% | +61.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.75% | 31.10% | +63.65% |
AVGU vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGU vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison
Neither AVGU nor PLTM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGU and PLTM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AVGU.
AVGU and PLTM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
AVGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AVGU and 0.50% for PLTM.
Find the right allocation for AVGU and PLTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer