AVGU vs. BAR
AVGU (GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - AVGU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). AVGU is actively managed, while BAR is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVGU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.
Performance
AVGU vs. BAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGU achieves a 72.79% return, which is significantly higher than BAR's 2.94% return.
AVGU
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 29.76%
- YTD
- 72.79%
- 6M
- 38.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAR
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.26%
- 3Y*
- 31.38%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- —
AVGU vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGU GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF | 72.79% | 32.37% |
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust | 2.94% | 29.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGU and BAR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGU vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank
AVGU
BAR
AVGU vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGU | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.76 | 0.90 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
AVGU vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGU drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGU and BAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGU | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.30% | -21.53% | -31.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -17.72% | +16.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.89% | -6.45% | -13.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.72% | — |
Volatility
AVGU vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGU | BAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.23% | 26.43% | +61.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.23% | 17.90% | +70.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.23% | 16.38% | +71.85% |
AVGU vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGU vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither AVGU nor BAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGU and BAR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AVGU.
AVGU and BAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
AVGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAR is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AVGU and 0.17% for BAR.
Find the right allocation for AVGU and BAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer