PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUSF vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUSF vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.96% return.


AUSF

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.23%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.67%
1Y
15.11%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*

XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUSF vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
6.72%13.69%16.05%22.26%-0.18%27.48%1.27%24.06%-10.79%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.96%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-13.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AUSF and XYLD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018

0.65

The correlation between AUSF and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AUSF vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AUSF
XYLD

Financial Services

18.7%
11.8%

Technology

13.5%
35.6%

Healthcare

12.0%
8.5%

Industrials

11.7%
8.3%

Communication Services

10.6%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
10.2%

Energy

5.2%
3.5%

Real Estate

4.1%
1.9%

Utilities

4.0%
2.3%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.8%

Financial Services

AUSF
18.7%
XYLD
11.8%

Technology

AUSF
13.5%
XYLD
35.6%

Healthcare

AUSF
12.0%
XYLD
8.5%

Industrials

AUSF
11.7%
XYLD
8.3%

Communication Services

AUSF
10.6%
XYLD
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

AUSF
8.5%
XYLD
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AUSF
7.8%
XYLD
10.2%

Energy

AUSF
5.2%
XYLD
3.5%

Real Estate

AUSF
4.1%
XYLD
1.9%

Utilities

AUSF
4.0%
XYLD
2.3%

Basic Materials

AUSF
4.0%
XYLD
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUSF vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSF
AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSF vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUSFXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.64

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.35

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

17.84

-10.30

AUSF vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUSF and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUSFXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.71

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.69

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.60

+0.04

Drawdowns

AUSF vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUSFXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.25%

-33.46%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-5.29%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-15.53%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

-18.66%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-0.15%

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-3.72%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.99%

+1.02%

Volatility

AUSF vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that AUSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUSFXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

0.88%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

5.37%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

6.55%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

11.22%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

14.21%

+4.86%

AUSF vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUSF vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than XYLD's 10.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
2.76%2.78%2.63%1.83%2.51%2.22%2.95%4.02%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUSF and XYLD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AUSF has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 7.72% for XYLD. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 2.76% for AUSF.

AUSF is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUSF and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer