AUSF vs. UGA
AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - AUSF is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AUSF returned 12.71%/yr vs 25.10%/yr for UGA. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AUSF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
AUSF vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return.
AUSF
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -12.35%
- YTD
- 75.49%
- 6M
- 64.35%
- 1Y
- 80.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 25.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
AUSF vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 6.72% | 13.69% | 16.05% | 22.26% | -0.18% | 27.48% | 1.27% | 24.06% | -10.79% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 75.49% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -32.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUSF and UGA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018 | 0.22 |
The correlation between AUSF and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUSF vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
AUSF
UGA
AUSF vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUSF | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.37 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 5.47 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 13.25 | -5.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUSF | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.32 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.73 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.12 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
AUSF vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUSF | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.25% | -86.59% | +42.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.84% | -14.88% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -26.68% | +14.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.23% | -38.11% | +23.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -12.35% | +10.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -36.76% | +32.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 6.13% | -4.12% |
Volatility
AUSF vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 2.41%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUSF | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 11.66% | -9.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | 30.41% | -23.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.14% | 35.14% | -25.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 34.38% | -20.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 37.27% | -18.20% |
AUSF vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUSF vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.76% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 1.83% | 2.51% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.02% | 1.46% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUSF and UGA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 25.10% vs 12.71% for AUSF. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 25.10% return vs 12.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
AUSF is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUSF and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer