AUBN vs. PLOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN) and Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW).
Performance
AUBN vs. PLOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUBN vs. PLOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUBN Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. | -10.45% | 20.17% | 16.32% | -2.81% | -25.99% | -20.35% | -19.63% | 71.98% | -16.65% | 27.56% |
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc. | 29.84% | 43.83% | -16.47% | -14.72% | -4.01% | -6.11% | -19.64% | 57.21% | -2.68% | 15.63% |
Fundamentals
AUBN:
$83.45M
PLOW:
$992.36M
AUBN:
$2.08
PLOW:
$1.99
AUBN:
11.50
PLOW:
21.19
AUBN:
0.15
PLOW:
0.78
AUBN:
2.02
PLOW:
1.51
AUBN:
0.93
PLOW:
3.53
AUBN:
$41.22M
PLOW:
$656.05M
AUBN:
$32.16M
PLOW:
$173.15M
AUBN:
$10.24M
PLOW:
$88.97M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUBN achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than PLOW's 29.84% return. Over the past 10 years, AUBN has underperformed PLOW with an annualized return of 1.54%, while PLOW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.
AUBN
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -14.22%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- 6.88%
- 5Y*
- -5.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
PLOW
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- 29.84%
- 6M
- 36.81%
- 1Y
- 87.68%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUBN vs. PLOW — Risk / Return Rank
AUBN
PLOW
AUBN vs. PLOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN) and Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUBN | PLOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | 3.25 | -2.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.79 | 4.39 | -3.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.49 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 6.74 | -6.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 16.08 | -14.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUBN | PLOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 3.25 | -2.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.05 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.29 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.40 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUBN and PLOW is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AUBN vs. PLOW - Dividend Comparison
AUBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than PLOW's 2.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUBN Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. | 4.53% | 4.01% | 4.60% | 5.08% | 4.61% | 3.22% | 2.45% | 1.89% | 3.03% | 2.37% | 2.87% | 2.97% |
PLOW Douglas Dynamics, Inc. | 2.80% | 3.61% | 4.99% | 3.98% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.62% | 1.98% | 2.95% | 2.54% | 2.79% | 4.22% |
Drawdowns
AUBN vs. PLOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUBN drawdown since its inception was -83.53%, which is greater than PLOW's maximum drawdown of -55.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUBN and PLOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUBN | PLOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.53% | -55.53% | -28.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.48% | -13.03% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.03% | -49.14% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.42% | -55.53% | -13.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.26% | -9.59% | -42.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.10% | -18.49% | -25.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.29% | 5.46% | +3.83% |
Volatility
AUBN vs. PLOW - Volatility Comparison
Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN) has a higher volatility of 20.39% compared to Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) at 9.09%. This indicates that AUBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUBN | PLOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.39% | 9.09% | +11.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.16% | 18.99% | +14.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.11% | 27.14% | +16.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.93% | 31.58% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.77% | 34.40% | +4.37% |
Financials
AUBN vs. PLOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. and Douglas Dynamics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AUBN vs. PLOW - Profitability Comparison
AUBN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.68M and revenue of 8.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.8%.
PLOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.61M and revenue of 184.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.
AUBN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.12M and revenue of 8.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
PLOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 19.33M and revenue of 184.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
AUBN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. reported a net income of 1.67M and revenue of 8.47M, resulting in a net margin of 19.7%.
PLOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 12.84M and revenue of 184.54M, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.