PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ATYM.L vs. SVR-C.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ATYM.L vs. SVR-C.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ATYM.L (Atalaya Mining Ltd) is a stock, while SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, ATYM.L returned 24.45%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for SVR-C.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ATYM.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATYM.L is traded in GBp, while SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR-C.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATYM.L achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly higher than SVR-C.TO's -16.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ATYM.L has outperformed SVR-C.TO with an annualized return of 24.45%, while SVR-C.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.53% annualized return.

ATYM.L

1D
4.08%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
-5.06%
1Y
82.02%
3Y*
38.85%
5Y*
25.14%
10Y*
24.45%

SVR-C.TO

1D
1.85%
1M
-20.54%
YTD
-16.00%
6M
-21.44%
1Y
69.87%
3Y*
34.76%
5Y*
18.05%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATYM.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd		-4.50%141.04%0.93%11.73%-18.78%88.92%22.40%-8.35%26.97%35.25%
SVR-C.TO
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)		-16.00%126.67%22.52%-5.26%15.42%-12.16%43.05%9.64%-4.59%-4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ATYM.L and SVR-C.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012

0.11

Over the past year, ATYM.L and SVR-C.TO have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Atalaya Mining Ltd

iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)

Often compared with ATYM.L:
ATYM.L vs. VYMATYM.L vs. YALLATYM.L vs. BTC-USDATYM.L vs. MARAATYM.L vs. CAML.LATYM.L vs. FCXATYM.L vs. MNS.TO
Often compared with SVR-C.TO:
SVR-C.TO vs. SVR.TOSVR-C.TO vs. PSLV.TOSVR-C.TO vs. MNS.TOSVR-C.TO vs. SBT.TOSVR-C.TO vs. HUG.TOSVR-C.TO vs. CGL.TOSVR-C.TO vs. GDX

Return for Risk

ATYM.L vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ATYM.L
ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO
SVR-C.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATYM.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ATYM.LSVR-C.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.79
1.22

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.32
1.60

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

1.44

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

3.19

+2.25

ATYM.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATYM.L and SVR-C.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATYM.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATYM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.06%, which is greater than SVR-C.TO's maximum drawdown of -60.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATYM.L and SVR-C.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ATYM.LSVR-C.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.06%

-60.18%

-32.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.50%

-48.72%

+12.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.87%

-48.72%

+11.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.50%

-48.72%

-8.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.65%

-48.72%

-19.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.98%

-47.15%

+23.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.66%

-32.00%

-30.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.05%

21.98%

-6.93%

Volatility

ATYM.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison

Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) has a higher volatility of 16.09% compared to iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) at 14.65%. This indicates that ATYM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVR-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ATYM.LSVR-C.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.09%

14.65%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.84%

54.74%

-15.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.66%

57.51%

-11.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.27%

35.57%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.47%

31.86%

+7.61%

Dividends

ATYM.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison

ATYM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while SVR-C.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd		0.75%0.71%1.71%1.91%0.91%7.14%
SVR-C.TO
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ATYM.L and SVR-C.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATYM.L and SVR-C.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer