ATYM.L vs. PPLT

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

ATYM.L (Atalaya Mining Ltd) is a stock, while PPLT (abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Platinum Price PM. Over the past 10 years, ATYM.L returned 24.45%/yr vs 3.34%/yr for PPLT. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ATYM.L vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ATYM.L is traded in GBp, while PPLT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PPLT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATYM.L achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly higher than PPLT's -22.88% return. Over the past 10 years, ATYM.L has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of 24.45%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.34% annualized return.

ATYM.L

• 1D: 4.08%
• 1M: -6.69%
• YTD: -4.50%
• 6M: -5.06%
• 1Y: 82.02%
• 3Y*: 38.85%
• 5Y*: 25.14%
• 10Y*: 24.45%

PPLT

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -17.71%
• YTD: -22.88%
• 6M: -27.63%
• 1Y: 19.24%
• 3Y*: 17.45%
• 5Y*: 7.67%
• 10Y*: 3.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATYM.L vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ATYM.L Atalaya Mining Ltd	-4.50%	141.04%	0.93%	11.73%	-18.78%	88.92%	22.40%	-8.35%	26.97%	35.25%
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF	-22.88%	108.49%	-7.30%	-12.77%	23.56%	-9.91%	7.52%	16.26%	-9.91%	-6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ATYM.L and PPLT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010	0.13

Over the past year, ATYM.L and PPLT have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

ATYM.L vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATYM.L

ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

PPLT

PPLT Risk / Return Rank: 14
PPLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
PPLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
PPLT Omega Ratio Rank: 16
PPLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
PPLT Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATYM.L vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATYM.L	PPLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	0.40	+1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	0.82	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.11	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	0.46	+1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.43	1.04	+4.39

ATYM.L vs. PPLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the PPLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATYM.L and PPLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ATYM.L vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATYM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.06%, which is greater than PPLT's maximum drawdown of -59.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATYM.L and PPLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATYM.L	PPLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.06%	-59.31%	-33.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.50%	-42.28%	+5.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.87%	-42.28%	+5.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.50%	-42.28%	-15.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.65%	-44.53%	-24.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.98%	-42.28%	+18.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.66%	-33.43%	-29.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.05%	18.55%	-3.50%

Volatility

ATYM.L vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison

Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) has a higher volatility of 16.09% compared to abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) at 11.71%. This indicates that ATYM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATYM.L	PPLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.09%	11.71%	+4.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.84%	41.74%	-2.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.66%	48.87%	-3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.27%	30.82%	+9.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.47%	27.65%	+11.82%

Dividends

ATYM.L vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison

ATYM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while PPLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ATYM.L Atalaya Mining Ltd	0.75%	0.71%	1.71%	1.91%	0.91%	7.14%
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATYM.L and PPLT in my portfolio?

ATYM.L and PPLT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.