ATTR vs. HTUS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HTUS.

Performance

ATTR vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's 11.11% return.

ATTR

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.57%
• 6M: 4.15%
• YTD: 4.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HTUS

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 10.53%
• YTD: 11.11%
• 1Y: 22.67%
• 3Y*: 20.01%
• 5Y*: 14.74%
• 10Y*: 12.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATTR vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF	4.60%	0.53%
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF	11.11%	1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ATTR and HTUS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

ATTR vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATTR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HTUS

HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 75
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATTR vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATTR	HTUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.89	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.78	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.62	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.68	—

Drawdowns

ATTR vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and HTUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATTR	HTUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-47.50%	+45.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.74%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-4.03%	+3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.79%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ATTR	HTUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.21%	12.05%	-8.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.21%	19.10%	-15.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.21%	21.49%	-18.28%

ATTR vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATTR vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison

ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF	10.70%	11.89%	17.80%	1.18%	5.63%	7.20%	3.77%	0.92%	8.69%	8.29%	3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATTR and HTUS in my portfolio?

ATTR and HTUS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ATTR or HTUS?

On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATTR or HTUS?

ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATTR or HTUS?

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.70%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.

What is the main difference between ATTR and HTUS?

They also come from different issuers: Arin Risk Advisors and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 0.97% for HTUS.