ATRL.TO vs. CLS
Compare and contrast key facts about SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).
Performance
ATRL.TO vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATRL.TO vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATRL.TO SNC-Lavalin Group Inc | 3.95% | 16.29% | 79.01% | 79.18% | -22.57% | 42.60% | -27.19% | -34.23% | -17.75% | 0.73% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | -1.09% | 205.58% | 242.31% | 154.08% | 8.47% | 36.67% | -4.07% | -10.34% | -9.22% | -17.19% |
Different Trading Currencies
ATRL.TO is traded in CAD, while CLS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
ATRL.TO:
CA$15.14B
CLS:
$33.46B
ATRL.TO:
CA$15.62
CLS:
$7.19
ATRL.TO:
5.90
CLS:
40.14
ATRL.TO:
0.01
CLS:
0.55
ATRL.TO:
1.41
CLS:
2.70
ATRL.TO:
2.75
CLS:
15.13
ATRL.TO:
CA$10.97B
CLS:
$12.41B
ATRL.TO:
CA$860.33M
CLS:
$1.44B
ATRL.TO:
CA$3.47B
CLS:
$1.21B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATRL.TO achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's -1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ATRL.TO has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 7.79%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 39.60% annualized return.
ATRL.TO
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- 3.95%
- 6M
- -8.55%
- 1Y
- 35.57%
- 3Y*
- 40.66%
- 5Y*
- 27.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
CLS
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 9.91%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 14.39%
- 1Y
- 254.82%
- 3Y*
- 184.43%
- 5Y*
- 105.58%
- 10Y*
- 39.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATRL.TO vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
ATRL.TO
CLS
ATRL.TO vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATRL.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 3.58 | -2.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 3.25 | -1.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.44 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 7.94 | -6.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.76 | 20.89 | -17.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATRL.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 3.58 | -2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 1.95 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.84 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.68 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between ATRL.TO and CLS is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ATRL.TO vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
ATRL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATRL.TO SNC-Lavalin Group Inc | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.19% | 0.34% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.80% | 2.50% | 1.91% | 1.80% | 2.43% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATRL.TO vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATRL.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -79.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRL.TO and CLS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATRL.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.02% | -96.93% | +22.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.17% | -29.24% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.72% | -53.96% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.02% | -80.60% | +6.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.08% | -18.12% | +5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -73.79% | +53.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.26% | 11.04% | -1.78% |
Volatility
ATRL.TO vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) is 11.22%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 23.56%. This indicates that ATRL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATRL.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.22% | 23.56% | -12.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.36% | 54.86% | -28.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.00% | 71.61% | -34.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.94% | 54.60% | -20.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.90% | 47.50% | -9.60% |
Financials
ATRL.TO vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SNC-Lavalin Group Inc and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATRL.TO vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
ATRL.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc reported a gross profit of 201.19M and revenue of 2.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.9%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 427.57M and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
ATRL.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc reported an operating income of 181.90M and revenue of 2.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 325.73M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.
ATRL.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc reported a net income of 95.01M and revenue of 2.93B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 271.61M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.