PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ATRL.TOSTN.TO
YTD Return60.75%9.23%
1Y Return56.82%22.98%
3Y Return (Ann)25.08%18.82%
5Y Return (Ann)20.59%29.02%
10Y Return (Ann)5.88%14.43%
Sharpe Ratio2.381.54
Sortino Ratio3.362.39
Omega Ratio1.431.29
Calmar Ratio2.142.40
Martin Ratio11.606.53
Ulcer Index6.00%5.13%
Daily Std Dev28.20%20.07%
Max Drawdown-74.02%-60.46%
Current Drawdown-1.99%-4.70%

Fundamentals


ATRL.TOSTN.TO
Market CapCA$12.13BCA$13.18B
EPSCA$1.84CA$3.07
PE Ratio37.6037.64
PEG Ratio0.611.00
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$6.86BCA$7.15B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$521.73MCA$2.82B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$550.58MCA$647.20M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between ATRL.TO and STN.TO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ATRL.TO achieves a 60.75% return, which is significantly higher than STN.TO's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ATRL.TO has underperformed STN.TO with an annualized return of 5.88%, while STN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.47%
0.87%
ATRL.TO
STN.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) and Stantec Inc. (STN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATRL.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATRL.TO, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATRL.TO, currently valued at 3.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ATRL.TO, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATRL.TO, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.57
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ATRL.TO, currently valued at 11.85, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.85
STN.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for STN.TO, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for STN.TO, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for STN.TO, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for STN.TO, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for STN.TO, currently valued at 6.53, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.53

ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATRL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the STN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATRL.TO and STN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.23
1.43
ATRL.TO
STN.TO

Dividends

ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ATRL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than STN.TO's 0.71% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ATRL.TO
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc
0.12%0.19%0.34%0.26%0.37%0.80%2.50%1.91%1.80%2.43%2.17%1.93%
STN.TO
Stantec Inc.
0.71%0.73%1.11%0.93%1.50%1.98%1.84%1.42%1.33%1.22%0.29%0.00%

Drawdowns

ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATRL.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, which is greater than STN.TO's maximum drawdown of -60.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRL.TO and STN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.11%
-5.49%
ATRL.TO
STN.TO

Volatility

ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) is 5.39%, while Stantec Inc. (STN.TO) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that ATRL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%11.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.39%
8.00%
ATRL.TO
STN.TO

Financials

ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SNC-Lavalin Group Inc and Stantec Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items