ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) and Stantec Inc. (STN.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATRL.TO or STN.TO.
Key characteristics
ATRL.TO | STN.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 60.75% | 9.23% |
1Y Return | 56.82% | 22.98% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 25.08% | 18.82% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 20.59% | 29.02% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 5.88% | 14.43% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.38 | 1.54 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.36 | 2.39 |
Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.29 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.14 | 2.40 |
Martin Ratio | 11.60 | 6.53 |
Ulcer Index | 6.00% | 5.13% |
Daily Std Dev | 28.20% | 20.07% |
Max Drawdown | -74.02% | -60.46% |
Current Drawdown | -1.99% | -4.70% |
Fundamentals
ATRL.TO | STN.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$12.13B | CA$13.18B |
EPS | CA$1.84 | CA$3.07 |
PE Ratio | 37.60 | 37.64 |
PEG Ratio | 0.61 | 1.00 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$6.86B | CA$7.15B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$521.73M | CA$2.82B |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$550.58M | CA$647.20M |
Correlation
The correlation between ATRL.TO and STN.TO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ATRL.TO achieves a 60.75% return, which is significantly higher than STN.TO's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ATRL.TO has underperformed STN.TO with an annualized return of 5.88%, while STN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) and Stantec Inc. (STN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Dividend Comparison
ATRL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than STN.TO's 0.71% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc | 0.12% | 0.19% | 0.34% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.80% | 2.50% | 1.91% | 1.80% | 2.43% | 2.17% | 1.93% |
Stantec Inc. | 0.71% | 0.73% | 1.11% | 0.93% | 1.50% | 1.98% | 1.84% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.22% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATRL.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, which is greater than STN.TO's maximum drawdown of -60.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRL.TO and STN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) is 5.39%, while Stantec Inc. (STN.TO) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that ATRL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ATRL.TO vs. STN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SNC-Lavalin Group Inc and Stantec Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities