PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATO vs. ENB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATO vs. ENB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than ENB's 21.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has outperformed ENB with an annualized return of 10.94%, while ENB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.


ATO

1D
1.03%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
2.53%
6M
2.08%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
10.94%

ENB

1D
0.07%
1M
3.68%
YTD
21.23%
6M
21.95%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
14.42%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATO vs. ENB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.53%23.07%23.35%6.17%9.63%12.75%-12.73%23.14%10.39%18.41%
ENB
Enbridge Inc.
21.23%19.51%26.35%-1.13%6.46%30.83%-13.60%36.05%-15.53%-2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ATO and ENB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.23

The correlation between ATO and ENB shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ATO:

$8.23

ENB:

$4.92

PE Ratio

ATO:

20.66

ENB:

11.48

PEG Ratio

ATO:

2.03

ENB:

0.53

PS Ratio

ATO:

5.70

ENB:

1.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATO:

$4.88B

ENB:

$69.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATO:

$1.61B

ENB:

$15.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATO:

$2.57B

ENB:

$17.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATO vs. ENB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATO
ATO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ENB
ENB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ENB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENB Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ENB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENB Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATO vs. ENB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATOENBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.30

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

3.03

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

7.64

-4.65

ATO vs. ENB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATO Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the ENB Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATO and ENB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATO vs. ENB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, which is greater than ENB's maximum drawdown of -46.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and ENB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATOENBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-46.35%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.58%

-9.10%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-15.29%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-28.32%

+9.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

-44.07%

+11.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.11%

-2.65%

-8.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-10.83%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

3.64%

+0.54%

Volatility

ATO vs. ENB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is 5.26%, while Enbridge Inc. (ENB) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that ATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATOENBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

5.99%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

12.96%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

16.21%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

18.65%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

24.33%

-3.09%

Dividends

ATO vs. ENB - Dividend Comparison

ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than ENB's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.28%2.15%2.36%2.61%2.48%2.44%2.46%1.92%2.14%2.14%2.31%2.52%
ENB
Enbridge Inc.
4.91%5.66%6.28%7.31%6.80%6.85%7.55%5.58%6.68%4.71%4.13%4.71%

Financials

ATO vs. ENB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and Enbridge Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
1.96B
22.36B
(ATO) Total Revenue
(ENB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATO vs. ENB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atmos Energy Corporation and Enbridge Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
ATO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ENB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 22.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ATO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 764.80M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.

ENB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 22.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

ATO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a net income of 581.90M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.

ENB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported a net income of 2.95B and revenue of 22.36B, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATO and ENB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENB has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to ATO (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATO dropped -51.94% vs ENB's -46.35%.

ENB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATO and ENB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer