PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ATO vs. BIPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ATO and BIPC is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

ATO vs. BIPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
14.85%
5.87%
ATO
BIPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ATO:

2.14

BIPC:

0.77

Sortino Ratio

ATO:

3.05

BIPC:

1.20

Omega Ratio

ATO:

1.38

BIPC:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

ATO:

3.33

BIPC:

0.54

Martin Ratio

ATO:

9.18

BIPC:

2.94

Ulcer Index

ATO:

3.59%

BIPC:

7.46%

Daily Std Dev

ATO:

15.46%

BIPC:

28.66%

Max Drawdown

ATO:

-51.94%

BIPC:

-48.51%

Current Drawdown

ATO:

-2.52%

BIPC:

-9.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATO:

$23.59B

BIPC:

$5.32B

EPS

ATO:

$6.98

BIPC:

-$5.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATO:

$4.18B

BIPC:

$2.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATO:

$2.16B

BIPC:

$1.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATO:

$2.18B

BIPC:

$669.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly lower than BIPC's 6.60% return.


ATO

YTD

6.00%

1M

1.48%

6M

15.18%

1Y

32.13%

5Y*

7.05%

10Y*

13.44%

BIPC

YTD

6.60%

1M

3.80%

6M

10.30%

1Y

19.99%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATO vs. BIPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ATO is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ATO is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ATO is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ATO is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ATO is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ATO is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BIPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIPC is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIPC is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIPC is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIPC is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIPC is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIPC is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ATO vs. BIPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATO, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.002.140.77
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATO, currently valued at 3.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.051.20
The chart of Omega ratio for ATO, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.381.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATO, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.330.54
The chart of Martin ratio for ATO, currently valued at 9.18, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.182.94
ATO
BIPC

The current ATO Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the BIPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATO and BIPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.14
0.77
ATO
BIPC

Dividends

ATO vs. BIPC - Dividend Comparison

ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than BIPC's 3.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.23%2.36%2.61%2.48%2.44%2.46%1.92%2.14%2.14%2.31%2.52%2.69%
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
3.80%4.05%4.34%3.70%4.11%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ATO vs. BIPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, which is greater than BIPC's maximum drawdown of -48.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and BIPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-2.52%
-9.91%
ATO
BIPC

Volatility

ATO vs. BIPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is 5.79%, while Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that ATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.79%
8.33%
ATO
BIPC

Financials

ATO vs. BIPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab