ATLX vs. LAC
ATLX (Atlas Lithium Corporation Common Stock) and LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — ATLX in Other Precious Metals & Mining, LAC in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. Over the past year, ATLX returned -3.91% vs 62.11% for LAC. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATLX vs. LAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATLX achieves a -12.77% return, which is significantly lower than LAC's -4.82% return.
ATLX
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -11.93%
- YTD
- -12.77%
- 6M
- -22.80%
- 1Y
- -3.91%
- 3Y*
- -44.85%
- 5Y*
- -15.17%
- 10Y*
- 47.64%
LAC
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- -14.78%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -13.00%
- 1Y
- 62.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATLX vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ATLX Atlas Lithium Corporation Common Stock | -12.77% | -33.18% | -79.76% | 2.09% |
LAC Lithium Americas Corp. | -4.82% | 46.80% | -53.59% | -27.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATLX and LAC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.44 |
The correlation between ATLX and LAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ATLX:
$100.51M
LAC:
$1.47B
ATLX:
-$1.41
LAC:
-$0.28
ATLX:
2.21
LAC:
1.09
ATLX:
$141.70K
LAC:
$0.00
ATLX:
$23.23K
LAC:
-$580.22K
ATLX:
-$38.45M
LAC:
-$52.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATLX vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank
ATLX
LAC
ATLX vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlas Lithium Corporation Common Stock (ATLX) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATLX | LAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.24 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 0.99 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 1.47 | -1.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATLX vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATLX drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than LAC's maximum drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATLX and LAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATLX | LAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -81.83% | -18.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.36% | -63.08% | +8.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.55% | -64.59% | -34.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.08% | -63.12% | -33.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.62% | 42.37% | -10.75% |
Volatility
ATLX vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison
Atlas Lithium Corporation Common Stock (ATLX) has a higher volatility of 24.57% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 20.88%. This indicates that ATLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATLX | LAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.57% | 20.88% | +3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.92% | 53.01% | +7.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.59% | 132.08% | -34.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.55% | 101.15% | +12.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7,895.97% | 101.15% | +7,794.82% |
Dividends
ATLX vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATLX nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ATLX vs. LAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atlas Lithium Corporation Common Stock and Lithium Americas Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ATLX and LAC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATLX has higher volatility (24.57%) compared to LAC (20.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATLX dropped -99.99% vs LAC's -81.83%.
LAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATLX and LAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer