PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATLX vs. FTNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATLX vs. FTNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atlas Lithium Corporation Common Stock (ATLX) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATLX achieves a -34.28% return, which is significantly lower than FTNT's 105.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ATLX has underperformed FTNT with an annualized return of 33.90%, while FTNT has yielded a comparatively higher 37.63% annualized return.


ATLX

1D
1.46%
1M
-23.63%
6M
-41.23%
YTD
-34.28%
1Y
-35.94%
3Y*
-52.91%
5Y*
-18.33%
10Y*
33.90%
ALL TIME*
-34.09%

FTNT

1D
0.78%
1M
4.45%
6M
100.78%
YTD
105.53%
1Y
67.64%
3Y*
42.19%
5Y*
21.83%
10Y*
37.63%
ALL TIME*
31.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$754.58K$1.04M$2.57M
$986.63M$864.34M$917.25M

ATLX vs. FTNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATLX
Atlas Lithium Corporation Common Stock
-34.28%-33.18%-79.76%346.86%22.81%442.86%-12.50%60.00%-75.00%3,900.00%
FTNT
Fortinet, Inc.
105.53%-15.95%61.42%19.72%-31.98%141.97%39.13%51.58%61.20%45.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ATLX and FTNT is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013

0.05

The correlation between ATLX and FTNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATLX:

$56.28M

FTNT:

$119.75B

EPS

ATLX:

-$1.32

FTNT:

$2.83

PS Ratio

ATLX:

486.28

FTNT:

16.27

PB Ratio

ATLX:

1.67

FTNT:

78.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATLX:

$141.70K

FTNT:

$7.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATLX:

$23.23K

FTNT:

$6.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATLX:

-$38.45M

FTNT:

$2.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATLX vs. FTNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATLX
ATLX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ATLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ATLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FTNT
FTNT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FTNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTNT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FTNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTNT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATLX vs. FTNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlas Lithium Corporation Common Stock (ATLX) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATLXFTNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.31

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

2.77

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

4.48

-5.45

ATLX vs. FTNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATLX Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the FTNT Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATLX and FTNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATLX vs. FTNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATLX drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than FTNT's maximum drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATLX and FTNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATLXFTNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-51.20%

-48.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.64%

-24.52%

-41.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.33%

-35.07%

-57.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.83%

-38.32%

-55.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.25%

-38.32%

-59.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.66%

-2.17%

-97.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-97.10%

-16.12%

-80.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.93%

15.15%

+21.78%

Volatility

ATLX vs. FTNT - Volatility Comparison

Atlas Lithium Corporation Common Stock (ATLX) has a higher volatility of 16.78% compared to Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) at 11.42%. This indicates that ATLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATLXFTNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.78%

11.42%

+5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.83%

32.97%

+22.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.33%

45.56%

+48.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

112.81%

44.15%

+68.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7,895.90%

40.85%

+7,855.05%

Dividends

ATLX vs. FTNT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATLX nor FTNT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ATLX vs. FTNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atlas Lithium Corporation Common Stock and Fortinet, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ATLX and FTNT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATLX has higher volatility (16.78%) compared to FTNT (11.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATLX dropped -99.99% vs FTNT's -51.20%.

FTNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATLX and FTNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer