ATH.TO vs. OMF
ATH.TO (Athabasca Oil Corporation) and OMF (OneMain Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. ATH.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while OMF operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ATH.TO returned 21.70%/yr vs 20.80%/yr for OMF. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATH.TO vs. OMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATH.TO is traded in CAD, while OMF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the OMF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly higher than OMF's -0.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ATH.TO having a 21.70% annualized return and OMF not far behind at 20.80%.
ATH.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -6.60%
- YTD
- 44.95%
- 6M
- 45.36%
- 1Y
- 81.64%
- 3Y*
- 52.56%
- 5Y*
- 59.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
OMF
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 16.06%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -2.06%
- 1Y
- 23.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.75%
- 10Y*
- 20.80%
ATH.TO vs. OMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 44.95% | 31.89% | 27.82% | 73.03% | 102.52% | 600.00% | -71.19% | -40.40% | -7.48% | -47.80% |
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | -0.70% | 33.39% | 24.88% | 59.15% | -22.59% | 23.50% | 31.34% | 80.60% | 1.32% | 9.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATH.TO and OMF is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2015 | 0.23 |
The correlation between ATH.TO and OMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ATH.TO:
CA$4.95B
OMF:
$7.31B
ATH.TO:
CA$0.45
OMF:
$6.73
ATH.TO:
22.82
OMF:
9.27
ATH.TO:
3.71
OMF:
1.49
ATH.TO:
2.68
OMF:
2.17
ATH.TO:
CA$1.35B
OMF:
$4.94B
ATH.TO:
CA$518.18M
OMF:
$2.20B
ATH.TO:
CA$505.02M
OMF:
$943.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATH.TO vs. OMF — Risk / Return Rank
ATH.TO
OMF
ATH.TO vs. OMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATH.TO | OMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 0.78 | +3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | 1.72 | +10.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATH.TO vs. OMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than OMF's maximum drawdown of -66.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and OMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATH.TO | OMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.41% | -66.24% | -33.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.50% | -30.10% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.62% | -30.10% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.37% | -42.93% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.63% | -66.24% | -28.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.24% | -6.69% | -38.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.56% | -23.63% | -49.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.66% | 13.56% | -6.90% |
Volatility
ATH.TO vs. OMF - Volatility Comparison
Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.89% compared to OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) at 8.47%. This indicates that ATH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATH.TO | OMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.89% | 8.47% | +4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.02% | 21.63% | +10.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.70% | 29.20% | +8.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.58% | 35.95% | +13.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.54% | 46.20% | +15.34% |
Dividends
ATH.TO vs. OMF - Dividend Comparison
ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | 6.72% | 6.17% | 7.90% | 8.13% | 11.41% | 19.08% | 12.33% | 7.12% |
Financials
ATH.TO vs. OMF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Athabasca Oil Corporation and OneMain Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ATH.TO and OMF have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATH.TO and OMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer