ATH.TO vs. CJ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO).
Performance
ATH.TO vs. CJ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATH.TO vs. CJ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 60.03% | 31.89% | 27.82% | 73.03% | 102.52% | 600.00% | -71.19% | -40.40% | -7.48% | -47.80% |
CJ.TO Cardinal Energy Ltd. | 32.53% | 48.34% | 14.78% | -8.86% | 87.05% | 420.73% | -68.03% | 24.70% | -52.26% | -48.12% |
Fundamentals
ATH.TO:
CA$5.52B
CJ.TO:
CA$1.83B
ATH.TO:
CA$0.49
CJ.TO:
CA$0.13
ATH.TO:
22.93
CJ.TO:
88.26
ATH.TO:
4.19
CJ.TO:
3.73
ATH.TO:
3.11
CJ.TO:
2.19
ATH.TO:
CA$1.34B
CJ.TO:
CA$492.81M
ATH.TO:
CA$561.21M
CJ.TO:
CA$224.06M
ATH.TO:
CA$450.56M
CJ.TO:
CA$205.23M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 60.03% return, which is significantly higher than CJ.TO's 32.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ATH.TO has outperformed CJ.TO with an annualized return of 27.38%, while CJ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.32% annualized return.
ATH.TO
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- 27.55%
- YTD
- 60.03%
- 6M
- 68.92%
- 1Y
- 101.61%
- 3Y*
- 51.58%
- 5Y*
- 83.55%
- 10Y*
- 27.38%
CJ.TO
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 15.20%
- YTD
- 32.53%
- 6M
- 51.77%
- 1Y
- 91.50%
- 3Y*
- 29.04%
- 5Y*
- 43.82%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATH.TO vs. CJ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ATH.TO
CJ.TO
ATH.TO vs. CJ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATH.TO | CJ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.45 | 2.75 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | 3.13 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 3.95 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | 16.86 | -4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATH.TO | CJ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.75 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.66 | 1.08 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.19 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.12 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between ATH.TO and CJ.TO is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ATH.TO vs. CJ.TO - Dividend Comparison
ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CJ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CJ.TO Cardinal Energy Ltd. | 5.80% | 8.29% | 11.11% | 11.46% | 4.99% | 0.00% | 3.66% | 5.77% | 17.79% | 8.25% | 3.97% | 9.58% |
Drawdowns
ATH.TO vs. CJ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.44%, roughly equal to the maximum CJ.TO drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and CJ.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATH.TO | CJ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.44% | -97.53% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.22% | -23.47% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.37% | -35.20% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.88% | -95.79% | +0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.55% | -1.30% | -38.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.33% | -53.59% | -20.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | 5.50% | +2.87% |
Volatility
ATH.TO vs. CJ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) at 5.90%. This indicates that ATH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CJ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATH.TO | CJ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.94% | 5.90% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.35% | 20.72% | +5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.65% | 33.41% | +8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.71% | 40.74% | +9.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.80% | 55.39% | +6.41% |
Financials
ATH.TO vs. CJ.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Athabasca Oil Corporation and Cardinal Energy Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATH.TO vs. CJ.TO - Profitability Comparison
ATH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 89.30M and revenue of 290.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.7%.
CJ.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported a gross profit of 22.68M and revenue of 109.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.
ATH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 75.38M and revenue of 290.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.9%.
CJ.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported an operating income of 14.17M and revenue of 109.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
ATH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a net income of 46.60M and revenue of 290.77M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
CJ.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported a net income of -29.92M and revenue of 109.19M, resulting in a net margin of -27.4%.