PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATFV vs. ROUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATFV vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ATFV having a 16.46% return and ROUS slightly higher at 16.55%.


ATFV

1D
-2.00%
1M
8.35%
YTD
16.46%
6M
16.04%
1Y
48.62%
3Y*
39.26%
5Y*
15.56%
10Y*

ROUS

1D
0.01%
1M
6.18%
YTD
16.55%
6M
16.75%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATFV vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ATFV
Alger 35 ETF
16.46%38.20%46.14%32.75%-35.97%4.19%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.55%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ATFV and ROUS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.68

The correlation between ATFV and ROUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ATFV vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ATFV
ROUS

Technology

42.1%
33.2%

Communication Services

25.8%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
10.7%

Industrials

8.2%
10.4%

Utilities

2.7%
3.8%

Financial Services

2.5%
10.6%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.8%

Energy

-

3.0%

Real Estate

-

2.1%

Technology

ATFV
42.1%
ROUS
33.2%

Communication Services

ATFV
25.8%
ROUS
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ATFV
10.2%
ROUS
9.6%

Healthcare

ATFV
8.6%
ROUS
10.7%

Industrials

ATFV
8.2%
ROUS
10.4%

Utilities

ATFV
2.7%
ROUS
3.8%

Financial Services

ATFV
2.5%
ROUS
10.6%

Basic Materials

ATFV

-

ROUS
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

ATFV

-

ROUS
5.8%

Energy

ATFV

-

ROUS
3.0%

Real Estate

ATFV

-

ROUS
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATFV vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATFV
ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATFV vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATFVROUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

4.95

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

20.38

-11.23

ATFV vs. ROUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATFV Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the ROUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATFV and ROUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATFVROUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.60

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.90

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.67

-0.08

Drawdowns

ATFV vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATFV drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, which is greater than ROUS's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATFV and ROUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATFVROUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.34%

-35.51%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.29%

-5.97%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.01%

-15.81%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.34%

-18.91%

-26.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

0.00%

-2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.81%

-4.24%

-13.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

1.45%

+3.88%

Volatility

ATFV vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.54%. This indicates that ATFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATFVROUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

2.54%

+5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

8.50%

+8.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.00%

11.37%

+11.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.62%

14.38%

+12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.55%

16.96%

+9.59%

ATFV vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATFV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATFV vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison

ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than ROUS's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATFV
Alger 35 ETF
0.17%0.20%0.16%0.01%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATFV and ROUS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATFV has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATFV dropped -45.34% vs ROUS's -35.51%.

On 5-year performance, ATFV leads with 15.56% vs 12.84% for ROUS. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ATFV has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ATFV.

ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.17% for ATFV.

ATFV tracks S&P 500, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Alger Group Holdings LLC and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ATFV and 0.19% for ROUS.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATFV and ROUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer