PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ATFV vs. QPX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ATFV and QPX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

ATFV vs. QPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025February
23.92%
34.16%
ATFV
QPX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ATFV:

1.03

QPX:

0.84

Sortino Ratio

ATFV:

1.42

QPX:

1.20

Omega Ratio

ATFV:

1.19

QPX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

ATFV:

1.23

QPX:

1.13

Martin Ratio

ATFV:

5.77

QPX:

4.28

Ulcer Index

ATFV:

4.36%

QPX:

2.81%

Daily Std Dev

ATFV:

24.36%

QPX:

14.32%

Max Drawdown

ATFV:

-45.34%

QPX:

-34.75%

Current Drawdown

ATFV:

-11.59%

QPX:

-3.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATFV achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than QPX's 0.08% return.


ATFV

YTD

-2.20%

1M

-6.85%

6M

16.50%

1Y

22.88%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QPX

YTD

0.08%

1M

-2.48%

6M

4.55%

1Y

10.55%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ATFV vs. QPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATFV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QPX's 1.46% expense ratio.


QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for QPX: current value at 1.46% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.46%
Expense ratio chart for ATFV: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATFV vs. QPX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATFV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ATFV is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ATFV is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ATFV is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ATFV is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ATFV is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ATFV is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

QPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QPX is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QPX is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QPX is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QPX is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QPX is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QPX is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ATFV vs. QPX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATFV, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.030.84
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATFV, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.421.20
The chart of Omega ratio for ATFV, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.191.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATFV, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.231.13
The chart of Martin ratio for ATFV, currently valued at 5.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.774.28
ATFV
QPX

The current ATFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the QPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATFV and QPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00OctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.03
0.84
ATFV
QPX

Dividends

ATFV vs. QPX - Dividend Comparison

ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022
ATFV
Alger 35 ETF
0.17%0.16%0.01%0.05%
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ATFV vs. QPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATFV drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, which is greater than QPX's maximum drawdown of -34.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATFV and QPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-11.59%
-3.85%
ATFV
QPX

Volatility

ATFV vs. QPX - Volatility Comparison

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a higher volatility of 8.32% compared to AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) at 3.76%. This indicates that ATFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025February
8.32%
3.76%
ATFV
QPX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab