ATFV vs. QPX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX).

ATFV and QPX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATFV is a passively managed fund by Alger Group Holdings LLC that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on May 4, 2021. QPX is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Dec 28, 2020.

Performance

ATFV vs. QPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATFV vs. QPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	-10.04%	38.20%	46.14%	32.75%	-35.97%	4.19%
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	-4.88%	24.12%	17.28%	44.63%	-30.90%	16.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATFV achieves a -10.04% return, which is significantly lower than QPX's -4.88% return.

ATFV

• 1D: 4.80%
• 1M: -5.88%
• YTD: -10.04%
• 6M: -11.50%
• 1Y: 43.26%
• 3Y*: 29.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QPX

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: -6.68%
• YTD: -4.88%
• 6M: -1.44%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: 10.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATFV vs. QPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATFV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QPX's 1.46% expense ratio.

QPX

AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF

ATFV

Alger 35 ETF

Return for Risk

ATFV vs. QPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATFV

ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 81
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 78

QPX

QPX Risk / Return Rank: 74
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATFV vs. QPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATFV	QPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.22	+0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.84	+0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.27	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	1.98	+0.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	7.90	+0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATFV vs. QPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the QPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATFV and QPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATFV	QPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.22	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.53	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between ATFV and QPX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ATFV vs. QPX - Dividend Comparison

ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	0.23%	0.20%	0.16%	0.01%	0.06%
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ATFV vs. QPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATFV drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, which is greater than QPX's maximum drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATFV and QPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATFV	QPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.34%	-34.74%	-10.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.29%	-12.02%	-6.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.36%	-9.19%	-5.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.36%	-8.27%	-10.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.27%	3.02%	+2.25%

Volatility

ATFV vs. QPX - Volatility Comparison

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) at 5.31%. This indicates that ATFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATFV	QPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.38%	5.31%	+4.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.50%	11.42%	+6.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.67%	19.24%	+8.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.63%	20.00%	+6.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.63%	20.15%	+6.48%