ATCL vs. RYLD
ATCL (REX Autocallable Income ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ATCL is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ATCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.
Performance
ATCL vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ATCL
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RYLD
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 24.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $407.20K | $547.21K | $849.08K | |
| $10.07M | $9.36M | $9.08M |
ATCL vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ATCL REX Autocallable Income ETF | 4.45% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATCL and RYLD is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATCL vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank
ATCL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RYLD
ATCL vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Autocallable Income ETF (ATCL) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATCL | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATCL vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATCL drawdown since its inception was -6.08%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATCL and RYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATCL | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -41.53% | +35.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.37% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -8.65% | +7.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.54% | — |
Volatility
ATCL vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATCL | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.71% | 10.67% | -2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.71% | 13.97% | -6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.71% | 17.04% | -9.33% |
ATCL vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATCL vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison
ATCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, less than RYLD's 11.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATCL REX Autocallable Income ETF | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 11.62% | 12.00% | 12.03% | 12.64% | 13.49% | 12.35% | 10.76% | 6.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATCL and RYLD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ATCL.
RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 5.72% for ATCL.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ATCL and 0.60% for RYLD.
Find the right allocation for ATCL and RYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer