ATCL vs. IPDP
ATCL (REX Autocallable Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. ATCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
ATCL vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ATCL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATCL vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ATCL REX Autocallable Income ETF | 3.53% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATCL vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Autocallable Income ETF (ATCL) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATCL | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ATCL vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATCL drawdown since its inception was -6.08%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATCL and IPDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATCL | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | 0.00% | -6.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | 0.00% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | 0.00% | -0.88% |
Volatility
ATCL vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATCL | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.06% | 0.00% | +9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.06% | 0.00% | +9.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.06% | 0.00% | +9.06% |
ATCL vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATCL vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
ATCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ATCL REX Autocallable Income ETF | 3.38% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ATCL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATCL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
ATCL has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ATCL and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for ATCL and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer