PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASQIX vs. GQSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASQIX vs. GQSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASQIX achieves a 23.02% return, which is significantly lower than GQSCX's 24.71% return.


ASQIX

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.25%
6M
17.34%
YTD
23.02%
1Y
36.64%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
9.56%

GQSCX

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.02%
6M
19.07%
YTD
24.71%
1Y
43.92%
3Y*
20.26%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASQIX vs. GQSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASQIX
American Century Small Company Fund
23.02%12.93%4.44%21.29%-21.34%21.65%16.42%19.71%-14.39%1.38%
GQSCX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio
24.71%12.22%11.49%18.94%-8.48%31.77%7.60%22.17%-11.32%1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ASQIX and GQSCX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017

0.96

The correlation between ASQIX and GQSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASQIX vs. GQSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASQIX
ASQIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ASQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ASQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GQSCX
GQSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GQSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GQSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASQIX vs. GQSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASQIXGQSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

4.85

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.32

17.65

-5.33

ASQIX vs. GQSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASQIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the GQSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASQIX and GQSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASQIX vs. GQSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASQIX drawdown since its inception was -63.58%, which is greater than GQSCX's maximum drawdown of -46.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASQIX and GQSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASQIXGQSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.58%

-46.87%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-8.74%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.78%

-28.83%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-28.83%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-0.16%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-8.08%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.47%

+0.35%

Volatility

ASQIX vs. GQSCX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) at 4.12%. This indicates that ASQIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASQIXGQSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

4.12%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

12.85%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.12%

18.36%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

21.82%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.48%

24.72%

-2.24%

ASQIX vs. GQSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASQIX and GQSCX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

ASQIX vs. GQSCX - Dividend Comparison

ASQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than GQSCX's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASQIX
American Century Small Company Fund
1.96%2.57%0.30%0.49%0.55%18.62%0.51%0.34%13.12%5.19%0.37%0.31%
GQSCX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio
2.65%3.01%10.53%0.70%9.45%10.41%0.51%0.59%0.77%0.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ASQIX and GQSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ASQIX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to GQSCX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASQIX dropped -63.58% vs GQSCX's -46.87%.

GQSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASQIX and GQSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer