PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASQIX vs. VTWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASQIX vs. VTWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASQIX achieves a 22.73% return, which is significantly higher than VTWG's 20.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ASQIX has underperformed VTWG with an annualized return of 10.40%, while VTWG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.12% annualized return.


ASQIX

1D
0.74%
1M
5.41%
YTD
22.73%
6M
20.30%
1Y
42.34%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
10.40%

VTWG

1D
-1.45%
1M
4.36%
YTD
20.43%
6M
16.97%
1Y
40.10%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASQIX vs. VTWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASQIX
American Century Small Company Fund
22.73%12.93%4.44%21.29%-21.34%21.65%16.42%19.71%-14.39%10.58%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
20.43%13.07%15.15%18.90%-26.49%2.84%34.72%28.75%-9.45%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ASQIX and VTWG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.94

The correlation between ASQIX and VTWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASQIX vs. VTWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASQIX
ASQIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ASQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ASQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWG
VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASQIX vs. VTWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASQIXVTWGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

2.71

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.55

9.72

+5.83

ASQIX vs. VTWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASQIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the VTWG Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASQIX and VTWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASQIX vs. VTWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASQIX drawdown since its inception was -63.58%, which is greater than VTWG's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASQIX and VTWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASQIXVTWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.58%

-42.07%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-14.88%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.78%

-28.58%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-40.49%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.59%

-42.07%

-3.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.45%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-10.50%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

4.14%

-1.35%

Volatility

ASQIX vs. VTWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Small Company Fund (ASQIX) is 5.99%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that ASQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASQIXVTWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

7.82%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.90%

16.92%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.00%

22.34%

-3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

24.67%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.57%

24.27%

-1.70%

ASQIX vs. VTWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASQIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASQIX vs. VTWG - Dividend Comparison

ASQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than VTWG's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASQIX
American Century Small Company Fund
2.02%2.57%0.30%0.49%0.55%18.62%0.51%0.34%13.12%5.19%0.37%0.31%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.59%0.64%0.55%0.79%0.71%0.54%0.48%0.72%0.72%0.64%0.96%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ASQIX and VTWG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWG has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to ASQIX (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASQIX dropped -63.58% vs VTWG's -42.07%.

ASQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASQIX and VTWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer