ASML vs. XLM-USD
ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) is a stock, while XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 10 years, ASML returned 36.00%/yr vs 60.23%/yr for XLM-USD. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASML vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a 74.80% return, which is significantly higher than XLM-USD's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML has underperformed XLM-USD with an annualized return of 36.00%, while XLM-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 60.23% annualized return.
ASML
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 17.61%
- YTD
- 74.80%
- 6M
- 73.02%
- 1Y
- 146.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.97%
- 10Y*
- 36.00%
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
ASML vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 74.80% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -60.36% | -68.37% | 14,396.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASML and XLM-USD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASML vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
ASML
XLM-USD
ASML vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASML | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.00 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.83 | -0.40 | +8.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.08 | -0.57 | +21.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASML vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, smaller than the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and XLM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASML | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -96.21% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -71.19% | +53.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.38% | -74.37% | +28.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.84% | -83.25% | +26.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.84% | -96.21% | +39.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -78.80% | +76.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.12% | -72.14% | +44.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 50.48% | -43.85% |
Volatility
ASML vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is 17.27%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 43.48%. This indicates that ASML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASML | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.27% | 43.48% | -26.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.58% | 59.28% | -24.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.75% | 70.60% | -27.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.44% | 74.72% | -32.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.72% | 112.79% | -74.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASML and XLM-USD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to ASML (17.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASML dropped -90.00% vs XLM-USD's -96.21%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASML and XLM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer