PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASML vs. NOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASML vs. NOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and ServiceNow, Inc (NOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a 80.96% return, which is significantly higher than NOW's -39.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML has outperformed NOW with an annualized return of 36.42%, while NOW has yielded a comparatively lower 20.79% annualized return.


ASML

1D
-0.02%
1M
18.15%
YTD
80.96%
6M
83.17%
1Y
157.02%
3Y*
41.76%
5Y*
24.38%
10Y*
36.42%

NOW

1D
-2.14%
1M
-8.93%
YTD
-39.28%
6M
-40.64%
1Y
-52.13%
3Y*
-5.03%
5Y*
-3.31%
10Y*
20.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASML vs. NOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
80.96%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%64.13%66.06%93.56%-9.80%56.23%
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc
-39.28%-27.75%50.05%81.96%-40.18%17.93%94.97%58.56%36.55%75.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ASML and NOW is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.41

The correlation between ASML and NOW shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASML:

$744.11B

NOW:

$96.73B

EPS

ASML:

€25.86

NOW:

$1.68

PE Ratio

ASML:

65.06

NOW:

55.37

PEG Ratio

ASML:

4.28

NOW:

0.47

PS Ratio

ASML:

19.33

NOW:

6.97

PB Ratio

ASML:

31.15

NOW:

7.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASML:

€33.69B

NOW:

$13.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASML:

€17.72B

NOW:

$10.69B

EBITDA (TTM)

ASML:

€12.99B

NOW:

$2.80B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASML vs. NOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

NOW
NOW Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOW Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASML vs. NOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and ServiceNow, Inc (NOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASMLNOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

0.80

+0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.85

-0.87

+9.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.82

-1.50

+25.31

ASML vs. NOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASML Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the NOW Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASML and NOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASML vs. NOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than NOW's maximum drawdown of -64.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and NOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMLNOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.00%

-64.54%

-25.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.85%

-60.28%

+42.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.38%

-64.54%

+19.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.84%

-64.54%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.84%

-64.54%

+7.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-60.27%

+60.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.11%

-13.85%

-14.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

34.83%

-28.21%

Volatility

ASML vs. NOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is 16.29%, while ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) has a volatility of 24.38%. This indicates that ASML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMLNOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.29%

24.38%

-8.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.37%

45.86%

-11.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.11%

50.56%

-7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.53%

43.53%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.77%

40.90%

-2.13%

Dividends

ASML vs. NOW - Dividend Comparison

ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while NOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.46%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ASML vs. NOW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and ServiceNow, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
8.77B
3.77B
(ASML) Total Revenue
(NOW) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ASML values in EUR, NOW values in USD

ASML vs. NOW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ASML Holding N.V. and ServiceNow, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
53.0%
75.1%
Portfolio components
ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.

NOW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceNow, Inc reported a gross profit of 2.83B and revenue of 3.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.1%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

NOW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceNow, Inc reported an operating income of 503.00M and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.

NOW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceNow, Inc reported a net income of 469.00M and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASML and NOW have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOW has higher volatility (24.38%) compared to ASML (16.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASML dropped -90.00% vs NOW's -64.54%.

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASML and NOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer