ASML vs. LQDA
ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) and LQDA (Liquidia Corporation) are both stocks. ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while LQDA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, ASML returned 17.48%/yr vs 105.41%/yr for LQDA. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ASML vs. LQDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASML achieves a 53.00% return, which is significantly lower than LQDA's 143.87% return.
ASML
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -11.50%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 53.00%
- 1Y
- 136.03%
- 3Y*
- 33.26%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 32.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.74%
LQDA
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 98.42%
- YTD
- 143.87%
- 1Y
- 350.03%
- 3Y*
- 120.93%
- 5Y*
- 105.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.24B | $3.55B | $3.45B | |
| $129.21M | $115.99M | $136.40M |
ASML vs. LQDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 53.00% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -28.93% |
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 143.87% | 193.28% | -2.24% | 88.85% | 30.80% | 65.08% | -30.99% | -80.26% | 73.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASML and LQDA is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
ASML:
$627.85B
LQDA:
$7.48B
ASML:
€27.54
LQDA:
$0.23
ASML:
51.36
LQDA:
361.38
ASML:
15.47
LQDA:
27.98
ASML:
24.94
LQDA:
78.33
ASML:
€35.33B
LQDA:
$288.07M
ASML:
€18.63B
LQDA:
$275.77M
ASML:
€13.77B
LQDA:
$51.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASML vs. LQDA — Risk / Return Rank
ASML
LQDA
ASML vs. LQDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASML | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.56 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 9.89 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.34 | 25.71 | -4.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASML vs. LQDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LQDA drawdown of -93.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and LQDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASML | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -93.87% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.95% | -35.66% | +13.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.38% | -46.80% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.84% | -55.36% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.01% | -5.53% | -12.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.04% | -68.43% | +40.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.40% | 13.69% | -7.29% |
Volatility
ASML vs. LQDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is 14.49%, while Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) has a volatility of 19.04%. This indicates that ASML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASML | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.49% | 19.04% | -4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.32% | 48.97% | -11.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.08% | 66.53% | -20.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.25% | 74.06% | -30.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.13% | 85.46% | -46.33% |
Dividends
ASML vs. LQDA - Dividend Comparison
ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.56% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ASML vs. LQDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and Liquidia Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASML vs. LQDA - Profitability Comparison
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 5.04B and revenue of 9.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.
LQDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.46B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
LQDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.92B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
LQDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASML and LQDA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQDA has higher volatility (19.04%) compared to ASML (14.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASML dropped -90.00% vs LQDA's -93.87%.
LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.31 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASML and LQDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer