PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ASMH vs. IGPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ASMH vs. IGPT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT).

ASMH and IGPT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASMH is a passively managed fund by Precidian Funds that tracks the performance of the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025. IGPT is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005. Both ASMH and IGPT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ASMH vs. IGPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASMH vs. IGPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
ASMH
ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF		25.77%58.84%
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF		-2.36%53.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 25.77% return, which is significantly higher than IGPT's -2.36% return.

ASMH

1D
4.15%
1M
-6.47%
YTD
25.77%
6M
39.55%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

IGPT

1D
4.64%
1M
-8.95%
YTD
-2.36%
6M
7.47%
1Y
43.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF

Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF

Often compared with ASMH:
ASMH vs. WCLDASMH vs. XLKIASMH vs. ARMHASMH vs. FTECASMH vs. IDGTASMH vs. VGTASMH vs. FEPI
Often compared with IGPT:
IGPT vs. AIQIGPT vs. CHATIGPT vs. BOTZIGPT vs. IRBOIGPT vs. QQQIGPT vs. VGTIGPT vs. XAIX

ASMH vs. IGPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IGPT's 0.60% expense ratio.

IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
ASMH
ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

ASMH vs. IGPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ASMH
IGPT
IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMH vs. IGPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMH vs. IGPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ASMHIGPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

1.44

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.12

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.62

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.00

0.52

+2.48

Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and IGPT is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ASMH vs. IGPT - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than IGPT's 0.05% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASMH
ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF		1.29%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF		0.05%0.04%0.00%0.00%1.41%6.21%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.15%

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. IGPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum IGPT drawdown of -50.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and IGPT.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ASMHIGPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-50.14%

+34.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-16.68%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-45.59%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-50.14%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.21%

-12.82%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-12.05%

+7.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

4.54%

—

Volatility

ASMH vs. IGPT - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ASMHIGPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

11.59%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

21.27%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.81%

30.39%

+6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.81%

26.90%

+9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.81%

25.83%

+10.98%