IGPT vs. BOTZ
IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGPT returned 16.57%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGPT charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
IGPT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 81.79% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 5.80% return.
IGPT
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 81.79%
- 6M
- 82.13%
- 1Y
- 133.37%
- 3Y*
- 45.90%
- 5Y*
- 16.57%
- 10Y*
- 23.41%
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 26.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- —
IGPT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 81.79% | 31.55% | 17.15% | 27.29% | -27.73% | -11.79% | 54.31% | 35.06% | 16.38% | 34.60% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 5.80% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGPT and BOTZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.74 |
The correlation between IGPT and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGPT vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGPT
BOTZ
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGPT
BOTZ
Communication Services
IGPT
BOTZ
Real Estate
IGPT
BOTZ
-
Industrials
IGPT
BOTZ
Healthcare
IGPT
BOTZ
Financial Services
IGPT
BOTZ
Basic Materials
IGPT
-
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
IGPT
-
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
IGPT
-
BOTZ
Energy
IGPT
-
BOTZ
Utilities
IGPT
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGPT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
IGPT
BOTZ
IGPT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGPT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.19 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.04 | 1.39 | +6.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.98 | 4.50 | +25.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGPT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGPT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.14% | -55.54% | +5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.68% | -19.34% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | -29.02% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.87% | -55.54% | +10.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.93% | +7.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -18.27% | +6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 5.96% | -1.49% |
Volatility
IGPT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a higher volatility of 17.50% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 9.29%. This indicates that IGPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGPT | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.50% | 9.29% | +8.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.97% | 19.63% | +8.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.36% | 25.19% | +7.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 26.96% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.80% | 25.80% | +1.00% |
IGPT vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGPT has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGPT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BOTZ's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 6.21% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGPT and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGPT has higher volatility (17.50%) compared to BOTZ (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, IGPT leads with 16.57% vs 2.28% for BOTZ. On fees, IGPT is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGPT has performed better with a 16.57% return vs 2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGPT is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.02% for IGPT.
IGPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IGPT and 0.68% for BOTZ.
IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGPT and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer