PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGPT vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGPT vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 58.95% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -0.94% return.


IGPT

1D
-4.48%
1M
-2.81%
6M
50.96%
YTD
58.95%
1Y
92.09%
3Y*
36.19%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
20.78%

BOTZ

1D
-2.82%
1M
-3.32%
6M
-6.64%
YTD
-0.94%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGPT vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
58.95%31.55%17.15%27.29%-27.73%-11.79%54.31%35.06%16.38%34.60%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
-0.94%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and BOTZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016

0.74

The correlation between IGPT and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGPT vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGPT
BOTZ

Technology

78.9%
31.8%

Communication Services

13.2%
4.4%

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Healthcare

2.5%
8.0%

Industrials

2.5%
49.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.9%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

IGPT
78.9%
BOTZ
31.8%

Communication Services

IGPT
13.2%
BOTZ
4.4%

Real Estate

IGPT
2.9%
BOTZ

-

Healthcare

IGPT
2.5%
BOTZ
8.0%

Industrials

IGPT
2.5%
BOTZ
49.3%

Financial Services

IGPT
0.1%
BOTZ
0.9%

Basic Materials

IGPT

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IGPT

-

BOTZ
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

IGPT

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

IGPT

-

BOTZ
0.5%

Utilities

IGPT

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGPT vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGPT
IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGPT vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGPTBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.10

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.55

0.61

+4.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.70

1.79

+16.91

IGPT vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGPT and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGPTBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.14%

-55.54%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.68%

-19.34%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-29.02%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.87%

-55.54%

+12.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.56%

-13.79%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.94%

-18.23%

+6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

6.54%

-1.60%

Volatility

IGPT vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a higher volatility of 17.85% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 10.37%. This indicates that IGPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGPTBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.85%

10.37%

+7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.02%

21.17%

+9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.98%

26.29%

+8.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.13%

27.21%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

25.88%

+1.18%

IGPT vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGPT has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGPT vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than BOTZ's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.49%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%0.00%
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
0.01%0.04%0.00%0.00%1.41%6.21%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGPT and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGPT has higher volatility (17.85%) compared to BOTZ (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 5-year performance, IGPT leads with 14.22% vs 1.21% for BOTZ. On fees, IGPT is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IGPT has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 1.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGPT is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.01% for IGPT.

IGPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IGPT and 0.68% for BOTZ.

IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGPT and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer