PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMH vs. AIPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMH vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 71.95% return, which is significantly higher than AIPO's 49.55% return.


ASMH

1D
-7.22%
1M
10.92%
YTD
71.95%
6M
74.08%
1Y
135.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIPO

1D
-4.86%
1M
2.22%
YTD
49.55%
6M
45.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMH vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and AIPO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMH vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMH
ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AIPO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMH vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASMHAIPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.08

ASMH vs. AIPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum AIPO drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and AIPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMHAIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-17.31%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

-4.86%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-4.44%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

Volatility

ASMH vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMHAIPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.85%

35.59%

+6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.28%

35.59%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.28%

35.59%

+4.69%

ASMH vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMH vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASMH and AIPO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

ASMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIPO is Building & Construction. ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Precidian Funds and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ASMH and 0.69% for AIPO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMH and AIPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer