AIPO vs. IVES
AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and IVES (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - AIPO tracks the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index while IVES tracks the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AIPO returned 46.89% vs 37.89% for IVES. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVES.
Performance
AIPO vs. IVES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 33.86% return, which is significantly higher than IVES's 18.13% return.
AIPO
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- YTD
- 33.86%
- 1Y
- 46.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.22%
IVES
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 15.32%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 37.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 39.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.27M | $38.04M | $47.00M | |
| $10.92M | $16.04M | $21.36M |
AIPO vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 33.86% | 9.46% |
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 18.13% | 13.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIPO and IVES is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.74 |
The correlation between AIPO and IVES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
AIPO vs. IVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIPO
IVES
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
AIPO
IVES
Technology
AIPO
IVES
Utilities
AIPO
IVES
Energy
AIPO
IVES
-
Financial Services
AIPO
IVES
Real Estate
AIPO
IVES
-
Consumer Cyclical
AIPO
IVES
Communication Services
AIPO
IVES
Basic Materials
AIPO
-
IVES
-
Consumer Defensive
AIPO
-
IVES
-
Healthcare
AIPO
-
IVES
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIPO vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank
AIPO
IVES
AIPO vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIPO | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.68 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | 4.11 | +2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIPO vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -24.36%, which is greater than IVES's maximum drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and IVES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIPO | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.36% | -22.64% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.36% | -22.64% | -1.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.84% | -10.52% | -4.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -6.43% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.33% | 9.23% | -1.90% |
Volatility
AIPO vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) at 8.88%. This indicates that AIPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIPO | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.74% | 8.88% | +5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.87% | 22.41% | +7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.61% | 28.14% | +9.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 26.95% | +10.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 26.95% | +10.32% |
AIPO vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIPO vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison
AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IVES's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 0.35% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIPO and IVES have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIPO has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to IVES (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIPO dropped -24.36% vs IVES's -22.64%.
On 1-year performance, AIPO leads with 46.89% vs 37.89% for IVES. On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, IVES has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIPO has performed better with a 46.89% return vs 37.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.
IVES has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.75% for IVES.
IVES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIPO and IVES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer