PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIPO vs. IVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIPO vs. IVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 33.86% return, which is significantly higher than IVES's 18.13% return.


AIPO

1D
3.42%
1M
-4.58%
6M
20.17%
YTD
33.86%
1Y
46.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
45.22%

IVES

1D
3.61%
1M
0.16%
6M
15.32%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
37.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
39.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$42.27M$38.04M$47.00M
$10.92M$16.04M$21.36M

AIPO vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and IVES is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.74

The correlation between AIPO and IVES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIPO vs. IVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIPO
IVES

Industrials

58.0%
4.4%

Technology

15.7%
71.4%

Utilities

15.3%
1.4%

Energy

6.8%

-

Financial Services

2.9%
1.4%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
9.4%

Communication Services

0.5%
11.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

AIPO
58.0%
IVES
4.4%

Technology

AIPO
15.7%
IVES
71.4%

Utilities

AIPO
15.3%
IVES
1.4%

Energy

AIPO
6.8%
IVES

-

Financial Services

AIPO
2.9%
IVES
1.4%

Real Estate

AIPO
0.9%
IVES

-

Consumer Cyclical

AIPO
0.7%
IVES
9.4%

Communication Services

AIPO
0.5%
IVES
11.9%

Basic Materials

AIPO

-

IVES

-

Consumer Defensive

AIPO

-

IVES

-

Healthcare

AIPO

-

IVES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIPO vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIPO
AIPO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AIPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIPO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AIPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIPO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IVES
IVES Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVES Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVES Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIPO vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIPOIVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.68

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.41

4.11

+2.30

AIPO vs. IVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIPO Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the IVES Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIPO and IVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -24.36%, which is greater than IVES's maximum drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and IVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIPOIVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.36%

-22.64%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.36%

-22.64%

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.84%

-10.52%

-4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-6.43%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.33%

9.23%

-1.90%

Volatility

AIPO vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison

Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) at 8.88%. This indicates that AIPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIPOIVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

8.88%

+5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.87%

22.41%

+7.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.61%

28.14%

+9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.27%

26.95%

+10.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.27%

26.95%

+10.32%

AIPO vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIPO vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IVES's 0.35% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AIPO and IVES have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIPO has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to IVES (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIPO dropped -24.36% vs IVES's -22.64%.

On 1-year performance, AIPO leads with 46.89% vs 37.89% for IVES. On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, IVES has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIPO has performed better with a 46.89% return vs 37.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

IVES has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.75% for IVES.

IVES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIPO and IVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer