PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIPO vs. IVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIPO vs. IVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 48.78% return, which is significantly higher than IVES's 14.36% return.


AIPO

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.70%
YTD
48.78%
6M
44.99%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVES

1D
-1.36%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
14.36%
6M
11.68%
1Y
35.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIPO vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and IVES is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.73

AIPO vs. IVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIPO
IVES

Industrials

46.4%
3.1%

Utilities

21.2%
1.3%

Technology

18.9%
71.8%

Energy

6.1%

-

Financial Services

5.3%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Communication Services

0.8%
10.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

AIPO
46.4%
IVES
3.1%

Utilities

AIPO
21.2%
IVES
1.3%

Technology

AIPO
18.9%
IVES
71.8%

Energy

AIPO
6.1%
IVES

-

Financial Services

AIPO
5.3%
IVES
1.9%

Real Estate

AIPO
1.0%
IVES

-

Communication Services

AIPO
0.8%
IVES
10.9%

Basic Materials

AIPO

-

IVES

-

Consumer Cyclical

AIPO

-

IVES
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

AIPO

-

IVES

-

Healthcare

AIPO

-

IVES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIPO vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIPO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IVES
IVES Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVES Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVES Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIPO vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIPOIVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

AIPO vs. IVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and IVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIPOIVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-22.64%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.35%

-13.37%

+8.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-5.86%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.32%

Volatility

AIPO vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIPOIVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.52%

27.13%

+8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.52%

26.65%

+8.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.52%

26.65%

+8.87%

AIPO vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIPO vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IVES's 0.36% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AIPO and IVES have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

IVES has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

AIPO is categorized as Building & Construction, while IVES is Technology Equities. AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.75% for IVES.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIPO and IVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer