PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AIPO vs. POWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AIPO vs. POWR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIPO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while POWR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the S&P U.S. Power Infrastructure Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AIPO returned 46.89% vs 18.20% for POWR. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for POWR.

Performance

AIPO vs. POWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 33.86% return, which is significantly higher than POWR's 13.87% return.

AIPO

1D
3.42%
1M
-4.58%
6M
20.17%
YTD
33.86%
1Y
46.89%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
45.22%

POWR

1D
1.56%
1M
-2.27%
6M
9.41%
YTD
13.87%
1Y
18.20%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
16.41%
10Y*
8.20%
ALL TIME*
4.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

AIPO

Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
$42.27M$38.04M$47.00M

POWR

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
$6.34M$6.81M$7.47M

AIPO vs. POWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF		33.86%9.46%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		13.87%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and POWR is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.65

The correlation between AIPO and POWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIPO vs. POWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
AIPO
POWR

Industrials

58.0%
23.7%

Technology

15.7%
5.4%

Utilities

15.3%
58.2%

Energy

6.8%
12.4%

Financial Services

2.9%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%

-

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

AIPO
58.0%
POWR
23.7%

Technology

AIPO
15.7%
POWR
5.4%

Utilities

AIPO
15.3%
POWR
58.2%

Energy

AIPO
6.8%
POWR
12.4%

Financial Services

AIPO
2.9%
POWR

-

Real Estate

AIPO
0.9%
POWR

-

Consumer Cyclical

AIPO
0.7%
POWR

-

Communication Services

AIPO
0.5%
POWR

-

Basic Materials

AIPO

-

POWR
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

AIPO

-

POWR

-

Healthcare

AIPO

-

POWR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with AIPO:
AIPO vs. DTCRAIPO vs. TCAIAIPO vs. VOLTAIPO vs. AISAIPO vs. IVESAIPO vs. IVEPAIPO vs. ARTY
Often compared with POWR:
POWR vs. GRIDPOWR vs. XLUPOWR vs. PAVEPOWR vs. ZAPPOWR vs. VPUPOWR vs. XLUIPOWR vs. SOXX

Return for Risk

AIPO vs. POWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
AIPO
AIPO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AIPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIPO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AIPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIPO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIPO vs. POWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

AIPOPOWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.26
1.06

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.74
1.53

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.19

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.87

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.41

6.51

-0.10

AIPO vs. POWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIPO Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the POWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIPO and POWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. POWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -24.36%, smaller than the maximum POWR drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and POWR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AIPOPOWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.36%

-65.98%

+41.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.36%

-9.77%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-23.14%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-25.09%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-63.42%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.84%

-5.32%

-9.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-17.99%

+12.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.33%

2.80%

+4.53%

Volatility

AIPO vs. POWR - Volatility Comparison

Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) at 5.41%. This indicates that AIPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AIPOPOWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

5.41%

+9.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.87%

13.62%

+16.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.61%

17.29%

+20.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.27%

22.93%

+14.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.27%

25.51%

+11.76%

AIPO vs. POWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than POWR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIPO vs. POWR - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than POWR's 5.66% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF		0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		5.66%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

AIPO and POWR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIPO has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to POWR (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIPO dropped -24.36% vs POWR's -65.98%.

On 1-year performance, AIPO leads with 46.89% vs 18.20% for POWR. On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, POWR has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIPO has performed better with a 46.89% return vs 18.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

AIPO is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while POWR is Infrastructure Equities. AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while POWR tracks S&P U.S. Power Infrastructure Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.40% for POWR.

AIPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIPO and POWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer