PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AIPO vs. POWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AIPO vs. POWR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while POWR is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares. AIPO is passively managed, while POWR is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for POWR.

Performance

AIPO vs. POWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 49.55% return, which is significantly higher than POWR's 17.55% return.

AIPO

1D
-4.86%
1M
2.22%
YTD
49.55%
6M
45.94%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

POWR

1D
-1.96%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
17.55%
6M
16.63%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
8.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIPO vs. POWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF		49.55%9.46%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		17.55%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and POWR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.61

AIPO vs. POWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
AIPO
POWR

Industrials

46.4%
33.0%

Utilities

21.2%
45.6%

Technology

18.9%
9.5%

Energy

6.1%
11.0%

Financial Services

5.3%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Communication Services

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

AIPO
46.4%
POWR
33.0%

Utilities

AIPO
21.2%
POWR
45.6%

Technology

AIPO
18.9%
POWR
9.5%

Energy

AIPO
6.1%
POWR
11.0%

Financial Services

AIPO
5.3%
POWR

-

Real Estate

AIPO
1.0%
POWR

-

Communication Services

AIPO
0.8%
POWR

-

Basic Materials

AIPO

-

POWR
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

AIPO

-

POWR

-

Consumer Defensive

AIPO

-

POWR

-

Healthcare

AIPO

-

POWR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF

iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with AIPO:
AIPO vs. DTCRAIPO vs. TCAIAIPO vs. VOLTAIPO vs. AISAIPO vs. IVESAIPO vs. IVEPAIPO vs. ARTY
Often compared with POWR:
POWR vs. GRIDPOWR vs. XLUPOWR vs. PAVEPOWR vs. ZAPPOWR vs. VPUPOWR vs. XLUIPOWR vs. SOXX

Return for Risk

AIPO vs. POWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AIPO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIPO vs. POWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

AIPOPOWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.25

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

1.79

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.22

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

2.98

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

8.63

—

AIPO vs. POWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. POWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum POWR drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and POWR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AIPOPOWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-65.98%

+48.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-7.09%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-23.14%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-25.09%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-63.42%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

-2.27%

-2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-18.09%

+13.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

2.45%

—

Volatility

AIPO vs. POWR - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AIPOPOWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

6.33%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

12.75%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.59%

16.94%

+18.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.59%

23.08%

+12.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.59%

25.52%

+10.07%

AIPO vs. POWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than POWR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIPO vs. POWR - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than POWR's 5.48% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF		0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF		5.48%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

AIPO and POWR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

AIPO is categorized as Building & Construction, while POWR is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.40% for POWR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIPO and POWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer