AIPO vs. POWR
AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIPO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while POWR is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares. AIPO is passively managed, while POWR is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for POWR.
Performance
AIPO vs. POWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 53.75% return, which is significantly higher than POWR's 18.65% return.
AIPO
- 1D
- 3.59%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 53.75%
- 6M
- 48.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWR
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 18.65%
- 6M
- 15.95%
- 1Y
- 30.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
AIPO vs. POWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 53.75% | 8.68% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 18.65% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIPO and POWR is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.59 |
AIPO vs. POWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIPO
POWR
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
AIPO
POWR
Technology
AIPO
POWR
Utilities
AIPO
POWR
Energy
AIPO
POWR
Financial Services
AIPO
POWR
-
Real Estate
AIPO
POWR
-
Communication Services
AIPO
POWR
-
Basic Materials
AIPO
-
POWR
Consumer Cyclical
AIPO
-
POWR
-
Consumer Defensive
AIPO
-
POWR
-
Healthcare
AIPO
-
POWR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIPO vs. POWR — Risk / Return Rank
AIPO
POWR
AIPO vs. POWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIPO | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.44 | 0.19 | +2.25 |
Drawdowns
AIPO vs. POWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum POWR drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and POWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIPO | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -65.98% | +48.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.35% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -18.16% | +13.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.38% | — |
Volatility
AIPO vs. POWR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIPO | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.13% | 16.70% | +17.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.13% | 23.08% | +11.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.13% | 25.62% | +8.51% |
AIPO vs. POWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than POWR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIPO vs. POWR - Dividend Comparison
AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than POWR's 6.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 6.66% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIPO and POWR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
AIPO is categorized as Technology Equities, while POWR is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.40% for POWR.
Find the right allocation for AIPO and POWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer