ASIAX vs. FERCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX).
ASIAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Nov 2, 1997. FERCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999.
Performance
ASIAX vs. FERCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASIAX vs. FERCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIAX Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund | 0.36% | 24.56% | 9.59% | 0.87% | -10.82% | -6.10% | 25.76% | 17.78% | -11.50% | 29.13% |
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C | 0.65% | 35.65% | 19.76% | 12.64% | -31.29% | -15.75% | 71.24% | 29.64% | -15.72% | 45.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASIAX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than FERCX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIAX has underperformed FERCX with an annualized return of 7.29%, while FERCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.
ASIAX
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
FERCX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -11.83%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 31.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASIAX vs. FERCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASIAX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FERCX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASIAX vs. FERCX — Risk / Return Rank
ASIAX
FERCX
ASIAX vs. FERCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASIAX | FERCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 1.58 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 2.10 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.31 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.15 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 7.79 | +1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASIAX | FERCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.58 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.06 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.56 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIAX and FERCX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ASIAX vs. FERCX - Dividend Comparison
ASIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.34%, while FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIAX Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund | 21.34% | 21.41% | 8.68% | 2.84% | 7.25% | 7.71% | 7.37% | 5.67% | 7.17% | 7.91% | 1.09% | 3.15% |
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.89% | 7.03% | 5.13% | 6.53% | 0.03% | 0.56% | 0.92% |
Drawdowns
ASIAX vs. FERCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIAX drawdown since its inception was -63.78%, roughly equal to the maximum FERCX drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIAX and FERCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIAX | FERCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.78% | -61.15% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -13.62% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -53.94% | +21.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.32% | -58.44% | +22.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.56% | -13.62% | +4.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -21.34% | +6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.76% | -0.84% |
Volatility
ASIAX vs. FERCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) is 7.36%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that ASIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FERCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASIAX | FERCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 9.62% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | 14.64% | -2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 20.30% | -3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 22.56% | -7.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 20.71% | -5.67% |