ASIAX vs. CNDX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L).
ASIAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Nov 2, 1997. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASIAX or CNDX.L.
Key characteristics
| ASIAX | CNDX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.47% | 7.09% |
| 1Y Return | 2.34% | 37.36% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.56% | 9.85% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.45% | 19.94% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.51% | 18.35% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.12 | 2.22 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.41% | 16.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -63.78% | -35.21% |
| Current Drawdown | -20.90% | -2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIAX and CNDX.L is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ASIAX vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ASIAX achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.L's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIAX has underperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of 4.51%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 18.35% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASIAX vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASIAX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASIAX vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASIAX vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
ASIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than CNDX.L's 0.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIAX Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund | 2.75% | 2.84% | 7.25% | 7.71% | 7.37% | 6.73% | 7.17% | 7.91% | 2.08% | 3.16% | 4.38% | 6.48% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 1.16% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
ASIAX vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIAX drawdown since its inception was -63.78%, which is greater than CNDX.L's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIAX and CNDX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASIAX vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) is 4.23%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that ASIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.