ASIAX vs. CQQQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ASIAX (Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both funds - ASIAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Invesco, while CQQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. Over the past 10 years, ASIAX returned 8.76%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for CQQQ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASIAX charges 1.45%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CQQQ.

Performance

ASIAX vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIAX achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIAX has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 8.76%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.85% annualized return.

ASIAX

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 4.25%
• YTD: 16.92%
• 6M: 18.15%
• 1Y: 40.51%
• 3Y*: 15.17%
• 5Y*: 6.02%
• 10Y*: 8.76%

CQQQ

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: 1.48%
• YTD: 2.98%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 28.75%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: -7.83%
• 10Y*: 5.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIAX vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASIAX Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund	16.92%	24.56%	9.59%	0.87%	-10.82%	-6.10%	25.76%	17.78%	-11.50%	29.13%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.98%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-24.54%	57.33%	33.57%	-34.77%	74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIAX and CQQQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2009	0.71

The correlation between ASIAX and CQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASIAX vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIAX

ASIAX Risk / Return Rank: 70
ASIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ASIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ASIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ASIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ASIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 26
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIAX vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASIAX	CQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	0.94	+1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	1.48	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.18	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	1.18	+2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.27	2.70	+9.57

ASIAX vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIAX and CQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASIAX vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIAX drawdown since its inception was -63.78%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIAX and CQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASIAX	CQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.78%	-73.99%	+10.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.73%	-24.41%	+12.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.36%	-35.93%	+15.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.85%	-66.96%	+36.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.32%	-73.99%	+37.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.74%	-48.92%	+46.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.08%	-28.35%	+13.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	10.68%	-7.49%

Volatility

ASIAX vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund (ASIAX) is 8.89%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 10.74%. This indicates that ASIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASIAX	CQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.89%	10.74%	-1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.70%	23.33%	-8.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.34%	30.65%	-13.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.39%	38.16%	-22.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.40%	33.38%	-17.98%

ASIAX vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIAX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASIAX vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

ASIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.31%, more than CQQQ's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASIAX Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity Fund	18.31%	21.41%	8.68%	2.84%	7.25%	7.71%	7.37%	5.67%	7.17%	7.91%	1.09%	3.15%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.10%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASIAX and CQQQ in my portfolio?

ASIAX and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASIAX or CQQQ?

CQQQ has higher volatility (10.74%) compared to ASIAX (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIAX dropped -63.78% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.