ASHX vs. KGRN
ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) and KGRN (KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF) are both China Equities funds - ASHX tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index while KGRN tracks the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASHX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KGRN.
Performance
ASHX vs. KGRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KGRN
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -8.44%
- YTD
- -8.65%
- 6M
- -10.18%
- 1Y
- -1.72%
- 3Y*
- -0.90%
- 5Y*
- -10.86%
- 10Y*
- —
ASHX vs. KGRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -13.59% | -26.45% | 2.64% | 42.24% | 35.03% | -27.51% | 3.06% |
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | -8.65% | 21.45% | -1.11% | -14.75% | -40.45% | 5.91% | 138.49% | 12.12% | -29.32% | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHX and KGRN is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017 | 0.53 |
The correlation between ASHX and KGRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ASHX vs. KGRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ASHX
KGRN
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
ASHX
KGRN
-
Industrials
ASHX
KGRN
Consumer Defensive
ASHX
KGRN
-
Technology
ASHX
KGRN
Basic Materials
ASHX
KGRN
-
Healthcare
ASHX
KGRN
-
Consumer Cyclical
ASHX
KGRN
Utilities
ASHX
KGRN
Energy
ASHX
KGRN
Communication Services
ASHX
KGRN
-
Real Estate
ASHX
KGRN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHX vs. KGRN — Risk / Return Rank
ASHX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KGRN
ASHX vs. KGRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASHX | KGRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASHX vs. KGRN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHX | KGRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -66.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -52.16% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.03% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.07% | — |
Volatility
ASHX vs. KGRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASHX | KGRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 23.48% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 34.65% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 32.82% | — |
ASHX vs. KGRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KGRN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASHX vs. KGRN - Dividend Comparison
ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF | 0.94% | 0.85% | 1.49% | 0.74% | 1.98% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 5.88% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASHX and KGRN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KGRN.
KGRN has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.
ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while KGRN tracks MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASHX and 0.79% for KGRN.
Find the right allocation for ASHX and KGRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer