PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASHS vs. HDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASHS vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ASHS having a 10.21% return and HDEF slightly lower at 9.88%. Over the past 10 years, ASHS has underperformed HDEF with an annualized return of 2.43%, while HDEF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.85% annualized return.


ASHS

1D
-2.86%
1M
-6.52%
6M
-0.37%
YTD
10.21%
1Y
42.00%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
2.43%

HDEF

1D
0.45%
1M
3.44%
6M
9.67%
YTD
9.88%
1Y
19.83%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHS vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
10.21%39.48%2.68%-10.03%-24.78%17.66%28.22%24.53%-35.91%7.90%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
9.88%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHS and HDEF is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.30

The correlation between ASHS and HDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASHS vs. HDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASHS
HDEF

Technology

34.4%
0.6%

Industrials

18.4%
7.7%

Basic Materials

16.1%
0.6%

Healthcare

6.5%
17.0%

Financial Services

5.5%
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
4.1%

Utilities

2.1%
7.8%

Energy

2.0%
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
19.5%

Communication Services

1.1%
3.9%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.8%

Technology

ASHS
34.4%
HDEF
0.6%

Industrials

ASHS
18.4%
HDEF
7.7%

Basic Materials

ASHS
16.1%
HDEF
0.6%

Healthcare

ASHS
6.5%
HDEF
17.0%

Financial Services

ASHS
5.5%
HDEF
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ASHS
5.0%
HDEF
4.1%

Utilities

ASHS
2.1%
HDEF
7.8%

Energy

ASHS
2.0%
HDEF
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

ASHS
1.7%
HDEF
19.5%

Communication Services

ASHS
1.1%
HDEF
3.9%

Real Estate

ASHS
0.5%
HDEF
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASHS vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHS
ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHS vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASHSHDEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.48

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

6.97

+1.89

ASHS vs. HDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASHS Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the HDEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHS and HDEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASHS vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, which is greater than HDEF's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and HDEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHSHDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.90%

-36.43%

-33.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

-8.03%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.13%

-11.15%

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.81%

-23.63%

-24.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.81%

-36.43%

-11.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.39%

-0.35%

-36.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.40%

-5.04%

-43.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

2.85%

+1.90%

Volatility

ASHS vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a higher volatility of 11.20% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) at 3.09%. This indicates that ASHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASHSHDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.20%

3.09%

+8.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.89%

9.62%

+10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.32%

11.78%

+13.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.93%

14.15%

+12.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.76%

16.11%

+9.65%

ASHS vs. HDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HDEF's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASHS vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison

ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.69%0.65%1.90%0.76%0.43%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.34%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.78%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASHS and HDEF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASHS has higher volatility (11.20%) compared to HDEF (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHS dropped -69.90% vs HDEF's -36.43%.

On 10-year performance, HDEF leads with 8.85% vs 2.43% for ASHS. On fees, HDEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HDEF has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.

ASHS is categorized as China Equities, while HDEF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index, while HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHS and 0.20% for HDEF.

HDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASHS and HDEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer