ASHR vs. YXI
ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - ASHR is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index, while YXI is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ASHR returned 5.39%/yr vs -8.43%/yr for YXI. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. ASHR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YXI.
Performance
ASHR vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than YXI's 6.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has outperformed YXI with an annualized return of 5.39%, while YXI has yielded a comparatively lower -8.43% annualized return.
ASHR
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 13.75%
- 1Y
- 40.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.39%
YXI
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- -3.19%
- 3Y*
- -12.24%
- 5Y*
- -3.21%
- 10Y*
- -8.43%
ASHR vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 10.26% | 27.02% | 11.95% | -12.52% | -27.52% | -1.57% | 36.29% | 36.50% | -28.45% | 33.47% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 6.15% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 12.40% | 4.78% | 13.94% | -17.95% | -14.35% | 9.63% | -28.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHR and YXI is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013 | -0.70 |
The correlation between ASHR and YXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.73 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHR vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
ASHR
YXI
ASHR vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASHR | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | -0.16 | +2.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.31 | -0.09 | +3.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.99 | +0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.30 | -0.24 | +5.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.41 | -0.42 | +16.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASHR | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | -0.16 | +2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | -0.10 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | -0.31 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.31 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
ASHR vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, smaller than the maximum YXI drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and YXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHR | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.30% | -81.15% | +29.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -14.66% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.12% | -53.12% | +20.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.76% | -57.65% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.30% | -64.92% | +13.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.52% | -78.33% | +62.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.19% | -54.30% | +25.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 9.17% | -6.69% |
Volatility
ASHR vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) is 5.94%, while ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that ASHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASHR | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 7.00% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 14.75% | -3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.84% | 19.89% | -3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 31.40% | -7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 27.42% | -3.36% |
ASHR vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASHR vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than YXI's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 2.09% | 2.31% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.89% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASHR and YXI have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YXI has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to ASHR (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHR dropped -51.30% vs YXI's -81.15%.
On 10-year performance, ASHR leads with 5.39% vs -8.43% for YXI. On fees, ASHR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ASHR has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ASHR has performed better with a 5.39% return vs -8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ASHR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YXI.
YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 2.09% for ASHR.
ASHR is categorized as China Equities, while YXI is Inverse Equities. ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index, while YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). They also come from different issuers: DWS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHR and 0.95% for YXI.
ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASHR and YXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer