ASGI vs. IWMI
ASGI (Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund) and IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) are both funds - ASGI is a Industrials Equities fund managed by Aberdeen, while IWMI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, ASGI returned 22.98% vs 37.32% for IWMI. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASGI charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IWMI.
Performance
ASGI vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASGI achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly lower than IWMI's 16.41% return.
ASGI
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- —
IWMI
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 37.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASGI vs. IWMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 4.04% | 44.20% | 1.47% |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 16.41% | 14.97% | 6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASGI and IWMI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASGI vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank
ASGI
IWMI
ASGI vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASGI | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 4.43 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 18.24 | -12.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASGI vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASGI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, roughly equal to the maximum IWMI drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASGI and IWMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASGI | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.71% | -23.88% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.15% | -8.40% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.10% | 0.00% | -10.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -4.04% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 2.03% | +2.59% |
Volatility
ASGI vs. IWMI - Volatility Comparison
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) has a higher volatility of 6.98% compared to NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) at 5.41%. This indicates that ASGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASGI | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.98% | 5.41% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 11.46% | +5.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.15% | 15.38% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 17.97% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 17.97% | -0.45% |
ASGI vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASGI has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASGI vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison
ASGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.68%, less than IWMI's 14.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 11.68% | 10.96% | 12.84% | 8.03% | 8.25% | 6.33% | 1.76% |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 14.51% | 14.05% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASGI and IWMI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASGI has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to IWMI (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASGI dropped -23.71% vs IWMI's -23.88%.
IWMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASGI and IWMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer