PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASEA vs. SIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASEA vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASEA achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ASEA has underperformed SIL with an annualized return of 7.64%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.


ASEA

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.21%
YTD
9.50%
6M
12.22%
1Y
26.01%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
7.64%

SIL

1D
-4.96%
1M
0.68%
YTD
4.75%
6M
15.66%
1Y
91.23%
3Y*
49.15%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASEA vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
9.50%19.80%9.82%4.88%5.24%4.66%-7.88%8.34%-7.58%35.06%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
4.75%166.16%14.62%1.31%-22.83%-18.35%40.30%34.78%-22.42%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ASEA and SIL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2011

0.36

ASEA vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASEA
SIL

Financial Services

58.6%

-

Industrials

15.4%

-

Communication Services

8.8%

-

Utilities

4.4%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Healthcare

2.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

2.1%
99.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

ASEA
58.6%
SIL

-

Industrials

ASEA
15.4%
SIL

-

Communication Services

ASEA
8.8%
SIL

-

Utilities

ASEA
4.4%
SIL

-

Energy

ASEA
3.5%
SIL

-

Real Estate

ASEA
2.8%
SIL

-

Healthcare

ASEA
2.3%
SIL

-

Consumer Defensive

ASEA
2.2%
SIL
0.2%

Basic Materials

ASEA
2.1%
SIL
99.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ASEA

-

SIL

-

Technology

ASEA

-

SIL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASEA vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASEA
ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASEA vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASEASILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.79

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

7.14

+1.58

ASEA vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASEA and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASEASILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.83

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.36

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.27

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.14

+0.14

Drawdowns

ASEA vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and SIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASEASILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.16%

-82.99%

+38.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-32.91%

+24.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.20%

-32.91%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.20%

-55.08%

+32.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.16%

-63.04%

+18.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-25.87%

+23.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-51.45%

+40.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

12.82%

-9.83%

Volatility

ASEA vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is 3.40%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that ASEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASEASILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

17.66%

-14.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

41.57%

-30.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

50.01%

-36.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

39.21%

-24.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

39.60%

-22.01%

ASEA vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASEA and SIL have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

ASEA vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than SIL's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
3.61%3.95%3.61%3.76%2.23%4.19%2.27%2.51%3.08%1.59%2.78%3.64%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.13%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASEA and SIL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIL has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to ASEA (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASEA dropped -44.16% vs SIL's -82.99%.

On 10-year performance, SIL leads with 10.69% vs 7.64% for ASEA. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, ASEA has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SIL has performed better with a 10.69% return vs 7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASEA and SIL have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

ASEA has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.13% for SIL.

ASEA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SIL is Silver. ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index.

ASEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASEA and SIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer