PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASEA vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASEA vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASEA achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 21.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ASEA has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 7.72%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.00% annualized return.


ASEA

1D
-0.56%
1M
6.95%
6M
10.72%
YTD
17.61%
1Y
32.88%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
7.72%
ALL TIME*
5.36%

DXJ

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.63%
6M
14.45%
YTD
21.25%
1Y
49.27%
3Y*
30.10%
5Y*
27.38%
10Y*
19.00%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$394.47K$542.80K$604.39K
$66.09M$60.67M$58.46M

ASEA vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
17.61%19.80%9.82%4.88%5.24%4.66%-7.88%8.34%-7.58%35.06%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
21.25%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ASEA and DXJ is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2011

0.45

The correlation between ASEA and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASEA vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASEA
DXJ

Financial Services

60.3%
18.3%

Industrials

15.6%
29.5%

Communication Services

8.0%
2.3%

Utilities

4.3%
0.1%

Energy

3.2%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Healthcare

2.2%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
4.7%

Basic Materials

1.5%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
13.3%

Technology

-

12.9%

Financial Services

ASEA
60.3%
DXJ
18.3%

Industrials

ASEA
15.6%
DXJ
29.5%

Communication Services

ASEA
8.0%
DXJ
2.3%

Utilities

ASEA
4.3%
DXJ
0.1%

Energy

ASEA
3.2%
DXJ
1.7%

Real Estate

ASEA
2.8%
DXJ

-

Healthcare

ASEA
2.2%
DXJ
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

ASEA
2.1%
DXJ
4.7%

Basic Materials

ASEA
1.5%
DXJ
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ASEA
0.7%
DXJ
13.3%

Technology

ASEA

-

DXJ
12.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASEA vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASEA
ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASEA vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASEADXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.30

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

16.08

-4.80

ASEA vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASEA and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASEA vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASEADXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.16%

-49.63%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-10.98%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.20%

-22.19%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.20%

-22.19%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.16%

-39.14%

-5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-3.40%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.56%

-14.24%

+3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.93%

+0.17%

Volatility

ASEA vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) is 3.39%, while WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that ASEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASEADXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

6.07%

-2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

14.35%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

18.07%

-3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.71%

19.07%

-4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

19.93%

-2.44%

ASEA vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASEA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASEA vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than DXJ's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASEA
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF
3.67%3.95%3.61%3.76%2.23%4.19%2.27%2.51%3.08%1.59%2.78%3.64%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
0.97%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASEA and DXJ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXJ has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to ASEA (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASEA dropped -44.16% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 19.00% vs 7.72% for ASEA. On fees, DXJ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, ASEA has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 19.00% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DXJ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASEA.

ASEA has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.97% for DXJ.

ASEA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASEA and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASEA and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer