ASCE vs. FNDA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) and FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ASCE is actively managed, while FNDA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASCE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDA.

Performance

ASCE vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCE achieves a 22.25% return, which is significantly higher than FNDA's 14.87% return.

ASCE

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 22.25%
• 6M: 21.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDA

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 14.87%
• 6M: 14.27%
• 1Y: 30.96%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCE vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	22.25%	8.61%
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	14.87%	7.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ASCE and FNDA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.88

Return for Risk

ASCE vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA

FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 56
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCE vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASCE	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.92	0.49	+1.43

Drawdowns

ASCE vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCE drawdown since its inception was -9.22%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCE and FNDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASCE	FNDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.22%	-44.64%	+35.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.36%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-1.01%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.10%	-6.69%	+4.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASCE	FNDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.25%	17.13%	+2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.25%	20.89%	-1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.25%	22.37%	-3.12%

ASCE vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASCE vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than FNDA's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.18%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	1.09%	1.22%	1.53%	1.37%	1.38%	1.15%	1.31%	1.38%	1.64%	1.30%	1.18%	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASCE and FNDA in my portfolio?

ASCE and FNDA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASCE or FNDA?

On fees, FNDA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASCE or FNDA?

FNDA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ASCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASCE or FNDA?

FNDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between ASCE and FNDA?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ASCE and 0.25% for FNDA.